I've also blogged about this:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~cjwatson/blosxom/ubuntu/2010-05-10-openssh-5.5p1
-for-lucid.html
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Here's the aforementioned PPA for Lucid:
https://launchpad.net/~cjwatson/+archive/openssh
Enjoy!
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
As per my previous comments in this bug, I intend to make this available
in a PPA for Lucid. I have not done this yet, but I will update this
bug when I have done so.
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thanks Colin,
But this bug with "fix released" means that it will be an update for the
LTS Lucid with 5.5p1-3ubuntu1 or a backport from maverick or at last a
PPA for Lucid ?
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
This bug was fixed in the package openssh - 1:5.5p1-3ubuntu1
---
openssh (1:5.5p1-3ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low
* Resynchronise with Debian. Remaining changes:
- Add support for registering ConsoleKit sessions on login.
- Drop openssh-blacklist and openssh-blacklist-extra
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/openssh
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail
** Branch linked: lp:debian/sid/openssh
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
Progress update: openssh 1:5.4p1-1 is in Debian unstable now. I'm
building an appropriate merge for Ubuntu at the moment, and will run
that locally for a while before feeding it to a PPA.
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because
** Branch linked: lp:~cjwatson/openssh/debian
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubunt
(Sorry for the double-post, just want threads of record like this to be
accurate)
Turns out revocation *is* supported, it's clearly in the release notes:
http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-5.4
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification be
Thanks for the attention, Colin. I can only imagine how busy you are
right now.
I'm very happy to hear the commitment to maintain a backport.
Damien Miller has a pretty excellent track record, separate from
OpenSSH's overall chain of successes (or lack thereof), but even so I
can deeply understan
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 08:24:19PM -, Matthew Weaver wrote:
> ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)
I'm going to leave this as it is since I'll doubtless be doing the work
anyway, but in general it's polite only to assign bugs to people if you
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:17:25PM -, Matthew Weaver wrote:
> Colin, what can be done to convince folks that inclusion of this OpenSSH
> release in lucid is the best idea?
>
> The certificate authentication support is most compelling for large
> institutional installations, the same user base
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Colin Watson (cjwatson)
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
Colin, what can be done to convince folks that inclusion of this OpenSSH
release in lucid is the best idea?
The certificate authentication support is most compelling for large
institutional installations, the same user base that focuses on LTS
releases (and have long upgrade cycles).
Missing it i
** Tags removed: kernel-series-unknown
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
** Tags added: kernel-series-unknown
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
I understand your concern, but I would rather that 10.04 LTS lacked
these features than that we introduced them and they were then found to
be broken in some way. There'll be more releases ...
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification be
Colin: understood. But that means that LTS will lack those features for
another 2 years :( Particularly the certificate and the umask feature
are interesting for server installations.
--
Update to OpenSSH 5.4p1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535029
You received this bug notification because you
19 matches
Mail list logo
