[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2008-04-21 Thread Omnifarious
Well, I would answer, but I know nothing of the Debian package management system or what debhelper is even for. -- Please backport mercurial 0.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52529 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2008-04-21 Thread tonfa
I don't have any problem running 0.7 with python2.5, or python2.4 from Hardy. I don't believe the problem is with mercurial, it might be a packaging problem or something else. (anyway 0.7 is really really old for something like mercurial which was started in 2005, it is only 6 months after the ini

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2008-04-21 Thread ^rooker
ok. That was also my assumption. Thanks for clearing it up. Still it feels strange that there hasn't been *any* reply from the mercurial developers since July 2006 - That's almost 2 years... -- Please backport mercurial 0.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52529 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2008-04-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
Answer the question in comment 2 above is what's needed. -- Please backport mercurial 0.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52529 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com htt

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2008-04-21 Thread ^rooker
Sorry, but I forgot to mention, that mercurial v0.7 that currently comes with dapper does not work with Dapper's current Python version (v2.4) - so backporting a more recent version would actually make mercurial usable at all. I'm refering to bug #53131: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/m

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2008-04-21 Thread ^rooker
Since this request is now over 1 1/2 year old: are there any news regarding this decision? (I didn't really understand why this request is declared "illegal") -- Please backport mercurial 0.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/52529 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2007-01-20 Thread Kai Kasurinen
Reject Ubuntu task. ** Changed in: mercurial (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected -- Please backport mercurial 0.9 https://launchpad.net/bugs/52529 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2006-08-04 Thread Omnifarious
And now, of course, Mercurial is up to 0.9.1 as of July 24th. -- Please backport mercurial 0.9 https://launchpad.net/bugs/52529 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2006-08-04 Thread Omnifarious
** Bug 55196 has been marked a duplicate of this bug -- Please backport mercurial 0.9 https://launchpad.net/bugs/52529 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2006-07-14 Thread John Dong
Rejected from dapper-backports until we receive word from mercurial packagers. ** Changed in: dapper-backports (upstream) Status: Confirmed => Rejected -- Please backport mercurial 0.9 https://launchpad.net/bugs/52529 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists

[Bug 52529] Re: Please backport mercurial 0.9

2006-07-13 Thread John Dong
-> Considering debhelper (>= 5.0.37.2) Tried versions: 5.0.7ubuntu13 -> Does not satisfy version, not trying Unfortunately, package requires newer debhelper than Dapper can provide. Mercurial Ubuntu packagers -- is the explicit debhelper version requirement necessary or can it be remov