Closing to match Debian, since we're more or less in sync. As for
fdisk, well, fdisk is not parted so problems with it should be filed
separately; but it looks like you've got it to work. fdisk is somewhat
lower-level so I'm not surprised at it requiring a little more manual
input.
** Changed in
** Changed in: parted (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
And a question regarding above usage of fdisk:
It seems to me that numbering of:
sectors begin with 0 , but cylinders begin with 1 count ?
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
1MiB boundaries are optimal for they also align with 128KiB and 256KiB
which could be used in solid disk hardware.
Now how to do this using fdisk:
My thought of using of 32 heads and 64 sectors per cylinder doesn't work for
older fdisk versions (openSUSE11.2).
Let's try the other way round:
"fdi
Unless more specific information from the disk is available, we should
be aligning to 1MiB boundaries by default in Lucid now, as of last
night. I can't speak for gparted which may well get things wrong, but
the installer should get this right now.
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bug
That geometry was reported by fdisk following my own clean win7 install
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Ulrich
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:44:22
To:
Subject: [Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries
Rachael wrote:
> Windows 7 uses a geometry of 240 heads with
Got it wrong...
240 * 63 * 512.0 / (1024 * 1024) = 7.3828125 MiB = 7560.0 KiB
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
Rachael wrote:
> Windows 7 uses a geometry of 240 heads with 63 sectors per track to
> accommodate solid state drives.
that is
240 * 63 * 512 = 7 MiB
alignment.
I heard about Win7 aligning at 1 MiB.
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this
lthough I don't really think this makes much difference, the
RAID stripe-width should be set to 32.
Rachael
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Ulrich
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:39:00
To:
Subject: [Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries
A new idea for par
not 100% sata compliant. So its best in
these circumstances to install using ext3.
Rachael
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Ulrich
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:39:00
To:
Subject: [Ubuntu-manual] [Bug 521045] Re: partitioning using mb boundaries
A new idea for partitioning a new disk Megebyte
A new idea for partitioning a new disk Megebyte aligned.
Using a different CHS config to get MiB alignments:
Now it is
1 cylinder = 255 heads * 63 sectors * 512 bytes
If you change fdisk config to
1 cylinder = 32 head * 64 sectors * 512 bytes
this should align a partition for parallel us with Wi
Scary different outputs on a mac mini
I have tried to align my many partition beyond the 4. partition.
But the following outputs scares me for they are totally different:
1. First Gpt fdisk from sf.net finds more available sectors
than ubuntu lucid fdisk which is powered by parted-2.2
2. fdisk -L
Sort of. It still needs a change in partman to apply optimal alignment
constraints, although this is definitely going to happen for lucid.
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
new libparted-2.2 should have solved the issue - so no extra
compatibility warning in regard to Win7 is needed any more
** Changed in: ubuntu-manual
Status: New => Invalid
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because
Added link for Debian upstream.
** Also affects: parted (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569998
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you
Thank you Colin, I aspect this is discussed further at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parted/+bug/511075
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thank you, I am aware of this issue. There are multiple other bugs to
be solved first, chiefly getting parted 2.1 into lucid.
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
... I don't know how to get attention from ubuntu developers to this
release critical issue...
** Also affects: parted (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you ar
Debian bug of this is closed:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569998
because of libparted-2.1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #569998
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569998
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You
Please add attention to this horrible Ms bug which will crackdown the
linux image seen by potential new users having Win7/Vista installed.
If you are able to follow german language discussion have a look at:
http://sidux.com/index.php?name=PNphpBB2&file=viewtopic&t=19795
for more users bad experie
** Also affects: gparted
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
** Also affects: ubuntu-manual
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
partitioning using mb boundaries
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521045
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
22 matches
Mail list logo
