[Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

2010-02-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Yes, "default-jdk" just installs a link from /usr/lib/jvm/default-java to openJDK6. -- Default Java paths aren't set up by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mai

Re: [Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

2010-02-10 Thread Soren Hauberg
ons, 10 02 2010 kl. 08:13 +, skrev Thierry Carrez: > I think there is a bit of misunderstanding here. Okay, I see (definitely not the behaviour I would have expected, though). Is it also on purpose that 'sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun' does _not_ create the link '/usr/lib/jvm/def

[Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

2010-02-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
I think there is a bit of misunderstanding here. "default-java" is not an alternative that can be served by any JDK/JVM (like the "java" command). It points to the default implementation of Java for your platform. In Ubuntu on amd64 and i386, the default Java stack is OpenJDK. It's an indirection

[Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

2010-02-09 Thread Gabe Gorelick
Subscribing the java packaging team as this seems to be there domain. -- Default Java paths aren't set up by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun

[Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

2010-02-09 Thread Gabe Gorelick
That's ok. Like you said, this is a convoluted issue. ** Also affects: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Default Java paths aren't set up by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

2010-02-08 Thread Soren Hauberg
Yes that is correct. I apologise for not being more clear in my report. -- Default Java paths aren't set up by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ub

[Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

2010-02-08 Thread Gabe Gorelick
Oh. I misread your original description to mean that only sun-java had this problem. I think I understand what you're saying now. You mean that if you just install sun-java and/or openjdk, then there is no default- java symlink. This symlink only gets created if you install the default- jdk package

[Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

2010-02-08 Thread Soren Hauberg
Okay, I called it an "infrastructure" bug as the same issue is affecting both Sun JDK and the OpenJDK packages. -- Default Java paths aren't set up by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 518948] Re: Default Java paths aren't set up by default

2010-02-08 Thread Gabe Gorelick
This isn't really an "infrastructure" bug as you put it. Rather it is a bug with a specific package not installing a file where it should. ** Package changed: ubuntu => sun-java6 (Ubuntu) -- Default Java paths aren't set up by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518948 You received this bug