Thanks for your work on this Andres.
3.0.3 is out, any chance of a update?
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
I meant: it will be synced from debian into lucid :).
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
This is good enough for me. This package is in the Feature Freeze
Exception queue. Once it gets accepted, i will be uploading it to
karmic.
Thanks for the testing.
Cheers,
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518029
You received this bug notification because you are
Looks good here. I did my testing on a couple 256 slices from
slicehost. glusterfs hit about 15% of CPU and glusterfsd never seemed
to pass 35% with both nodes being hammered by bonnie++ at the same time.
Anything else I can do to help the process along?
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https:
I will try to spin up a couple of VMs tomorrow and run it with bonnie++
and some other stuff to stress it and make sure it doesn't max cpu.
I'll post a follow up here when done.
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518029
You received this bug notification because you
Dave,
The FFe is in process. Could you please test glusterfs that's on my ppa?
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:andreserl/other
sudo apt-get update
And then install glusterfs and test if it works as it should please.
Thanks a lot.
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518
Any update on this Andres? Let me know if there is anything I can do to
help things along.
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
The debian packages as they are should be working fine in Ubuntu.
However, I wan't to test if they build/install before requesting a Sync
from debian so that we don't have an FTBFS in archive. But, due to the
history of the package in Ubuntu, it should be fine witht a sync. i'll
work on it today.
Someone emailed me and asked where I got my 9.10 debs for gluster from.
I used the debian unstable (or was it testing?) source and compiled it
locally. Info on the testing source is available at
http://packages.debian.org/source/squeeze/glusterfs
It _should_ be possible to grab the binary package
I have since upgraded to 3.0.2 debs based on the Debian packaging. They
are working fine on my 9.10 AMD64 boxes. If the Lucid debs built by
Andres are backwards compatible with 9.10, I can give them a try in our
staging environment in the coming days. Thanks Andres for taking care f
this one.
-
Hello guys,
I agree with you. I'll prepare test packages to see if the problem is
fixed and will require your testing. Once confirmed that the new
upstream release fixes this bug, I'll personally oversee its inclusion
in lucid.
Cheers
** Changed in: glusterfs (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned)
I agree with Dave on this one.
Had the same issue and 3.0.x fixed it.
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
3.0.2 was released recently which seemed to fix some major issues some
people have been experiencing. The relnotes are available at
http://ftp.gluster.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.0/LATEST/GlusterFS_3.0.2_Release_Notes.pdf
More details on the issues closed in 3.0.2 can be found at
http://is.gd/8hU
Actually reading the glusterfs mailing lists will give a different impression.
2.0.9 runs very fine for most people while the incompatible 3.0.x releases
still seem a bit rough.
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518029
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: glusterfs
Status: Unknown => Won't Fix
--
glusterfs 2.0.x max's out CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518029
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
16 matches
Mail list logo
