And my comment was pointing out that even if I had the power to design
both USC and Nautilus right down to the pixel, I would still make their
hierarchy controls look different, because they would behave
differently. And I don't think it's useful to claim that the USC
pathbutton looks non-native wh
My comment was to draw attention to the fact that the buttons look
screamingly different when trying to achieve similar goals. USC
implementation can be aesthetically and technically superior, but it
still looks like some non-native application.
--
Software Center ignores GTK style breadcrumb but
This bug report is invalid because GTK does not have a built-in
pathbutton control for USC to use. Nautilus's use of buttons is ugly and
awkward: they're a hierarchy but don't look like it, they're draggable
but don't look like it, and the use of scroll buttons instead of
ellipsis in deep hierarchi
Actually I'd like to see it the other way around, having the breadcrumb
in nautilus. I checked the code for the breadcrumb in software center
and it seems a lot of (pyhon) work has gone in to making it (with
special theming and stuff). Wouldn't it be better to have this included
into gtk? Does it e
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
Software Center ignores GTK style breadcrumb buttons
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509357
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Attachment added: "Ubuntu Software Center-buttons.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38057185/Ubuntu%20Software%20Center-buttons.png
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38057186/Dependencies.txt
--
Software Center ignores GTK style breadcrumb buttons
h
