If lightdm is ready, we'll switch to it in natty (I think lubuntu will
do the same). Otherwise, we'll keep gdm for one more cycle, and won't
switch to slim.
** Changed in: xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
** Changed in: xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) =>
I wasn't aware of Lightdm; it looks pretty promising. I've filed a few
comments on the handful of wishlist items it has here on LP.
Lxdm does seem to me like the only other option that's actively being
maintained... which is disappointing, because it's shoddy code and has a
number of significant b
Not sure we will switch to slim. More likely to lxdm, or even more to
lightdm, when it's ready.
--
(Xubuntu) Use SLiM In Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508423
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
@Charlie: Thanks for the note; I've just filed bug #552858.
@coldReactive: Some day, you're going to learn that the worst response
anyone can give you is no response at all.
--
(Xubuntu) Use SLiM In Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508423
You received this bug notification because you are a
@Daniel Richard G.
Please do not apologize for me. If you cannot offer a friendly
environment for users who want to change something, but have no coding
experience, patch experience, or experience on the workings of any type
of structure, API, etc... you should give them the opportunity anyway to
Please do file a new bug report for the requested wishlist item. Thanks
for helping improve Xubuntu.
--
(Xubuntu) Use SLiM In Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508423
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
Lionel, Pasi, please excuse the rudeness of certain bug-reporters here
who do not appreciate the hard work that you do.
Now that the gdm-2.20 package is history, xubuntu-desktop requires the
installation of gdm, which pulls in libbonobo and a boatload of other
GNOME dependencies that I'd rather do
Yeah, ESPECIALLY when I can't get a deb, make a deb myself (giftwrap or
alien from RPM) of ayttm 0.6.1 when the current 0.5.0 karmic ayttm has
severe issues... and going on their mailing list got me no where within
5 emails... yeah, I really want to subscribe on another mailing list.
Sorry, but no
coldReactive,
we sure will discuss it and have discussed it before as well. To be
honest, I don't see your attitude being very creative.
Including a package as default for a release (especially LTS) needs more
than being in the archive and working (quite) well for limited amount of
people. Even t
I just used SLiM from here in Karmic:
https://launchpad.net/~stemp/+archive/xfce/+packages
And it works quite well actually. I see no problems with using it in
Lucid if it works here in Karmic.
--
(Xubuntu) Use SLiM In Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508423
You received this bug notificati
Discuss away then, I won't participate in it. I find mailing-lists rude
most of the time.
--
(Xubuntu) Use SLiM In Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508423
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Thanks for your bug report.
FYI, I've experienced some weird issues with slim, such as xfdesktop not
using the same $XDG_USER_DIR as other components.
This needs to be discussed on our development mailing list (xubuntu-
de...@lists.ubuntu.com) before doing anything anyway.
** Package changed: xf
12 matches
Mail list logo
