[Bug 490512] Re: Disable Trash/Delete bindings when appropriate

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: nautilus Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: nautilus Importance: Unknown => Low -- Disable Trash/Delete bindings when appropriate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 490512] Re: Disable Trash/Delete bindings when appropriate

2010-02-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/nautilus -- Disable Trash/Delete bindings when appropriate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https

[Bug 490512] Re: Disable Trash/Delete bindings when appropriate

2009-12-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package nautilus - 1:2.28.3-0ubuntu1 --- nautilus (1:2.28.3-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * New upstream version: - Fix memory leaks - Don't rewrite bookmars unnecessary on startup - Fix background "darkness" detection for font color (lp: #356289

[Bug 490512] Re: Disable Trash/Delete bindings when appropriate

2009-12-01 Thread Sebastien Bacher
I've pinged alex on IRC for patch review now ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- Disable Trash/Delete bindings when appropriate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/490512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 490512] Re: Disable Trash/Delete bindings when appropriate

2009-12-01 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your work there > (I know karmic already has an ubuntu3 in -proposed -- aren't you supposed to use 1.2 for that sort of thing?) not really, we are supposed to use any number not used yet and lower than what will go in lucid ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 490512] Re: Disable Trash/Delete bindings when appropriate

2009-11-30 Thread Michael Terry
The version in this debdiff is likely to change (I know karmic already has an ubuntu3 in -proposed -- aren't you supposed to use 1.2 for that sort of thing?). But the patch is sound and will likely apply to a future 2.29.x update. Patch is the same as the one I attached to upstream bug. ** Attac