There's nothing to keep. It's been removed and per policy cannot be re-
introduced.
** Changed in: kdevelop (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488911
You received this bug notificatio
Wow, I wish the kdevelop team would wither make kdevelop4 work before throwing
out support for kdevelop3. This is highly disappointing.
I and my team have been using kdevelop3 for a rather large in-house project
(about 310k lines of code) and kdevelop4 breaks a LOT of stuff. I have
developers wh
For some rather odd value of the word "fine", yes, they do.
Not really relevant to trying to support large projects for server code
though, which was the point of my original report.
I'm still not sure why this policy has been applied to kdevelop when a
quick review of the official repositories i
Qt Creator, vim, emacs and even Kate all work fine.
--
needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488911
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
OK. Has the person who set that policy actually tried to develop C++
code on karmic?
I'll have to go find a distro that supports developers, I guess :-( I
don't have time to waste on silliness. I have to produce working code.
--
needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)
h
KDevelop3 is unmaintained, and Ubuntu policy states that unmaintained
software cannot enter the repositories.
** Changed in: kdevelop (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488911
You received
