This bug was fixed in the package ca-certificates - 20130906
---
ca-certificates (20130906) unstable; urgency=low
* Add ca-certificates-local source package example to documentation
* Update local certificate handling in README.Debian.
Closes: #718173, LP: #487845
* Update
** Branch linked: lp:debian/ca-certificates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487845
Title:
Support for /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ is incomplete
To manage notifications about thi
Pending upload to Debian, these have been committed to the collab-maint
git repository:
* Add ca-certificates-local source package example to documentation
* Update local certificate handling in README.Debian.
In addition to adding a bit more documentation on local certificate
handling, I hav
** Changed in: ca-certificates (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487845
Title:
Support for /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ is incomplet
** Changed in: ca-certificates (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487845
Title:
Support for /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ is incomplete
--
ubu
Okay, my bad: certificates in $LOCALCERTSDIR *are* added to
/etc/ssl/certs/, even though they don't appear in the multiselect list.
I don't have a need to disable locally-installed certificates via the
multiselect, but do believe the behavior should be for local
certificates to appear in the list.
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 05:37:58PM -, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> I can see where you're coming from, but I think it would be less
> confusing to the user if local certificates were handled just the same
> as system-bundled ones. I wouldn't see it as a good thing if the
> procedure for enabling/
I can see where you're coming from, but I think it would be less
confusing to the user if local certificates were handled just the same
as system-bundled ones. I wouldn't see it as a good thing if the
procedure for enabling/disabling a certificate differed depending on
whether it were locally-insta
IMHO they should not. If an administrator chooses to install
certificates there they are assumed to be wanted.
--
Support for /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ is incomplete
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487845
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Subscribed Matthias Klose, from Bug #293944.
Matthias, this issue needs a bit more work. Please have a look at the
package's debconf script.
--
Support for /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ is incomplete
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/487845
You received this bug notification because you are a
10 matches
Mail list logo
