[Bug 486576] Re: GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in libc.so.6 with link time reference

2012-01-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for glib2.0 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486576

[Bug 486576] Re: GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in libc.so.6 with link time reference

2011-11-26 Thread Raphaƫl Hertzog
This looks like a too-lax dependency from glib against libc6. It's pretty old I'm not sure there's anything useful to find here. ** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) => glib2.0 (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 486576] Re: GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in libc.so.6 with link time reference

2010-01-14 Thread Boniek
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in libc.so.6 with link time reference https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailin

[Bug 486576] Re: GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in libc.so.6 with link time reference

2009-12-29 Thread t54
My computer, (i386, original install of jaunty, then upgraded to karmic, now with latest kernel updates) just developed a similar problem after attempting to update all application pkgs in synaptic. Synaptic completed most but not all the application upgrades even after repeating the exercise seve

[Bug 486576] Re: GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in libc.so.6 with link time reference

2009-11-22 Thread Sancho
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35940608/Dependencies.txt -- GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in libc.so.6 with link time reference https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486576 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr