[Expired for apport (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a
X3 [2009-11-25 10:35 -]:
> Pehaps the Karmic documentation on this should be revised and the root
> of why this has happened on a minimal install spits out that error when
> like you say it should have outputed that -c is invalid to start with.
Where did you see the -c being documented? I'm in
###Also, the error you got shows that it was actually reading the
.apport file and stumbled over an invalidly formatted line. If there
###were problems with recognizing the command line arguments, it would
have looked completely different.
Well in this case some bug does exist in the minimal insta
Well if I said Karmic then it was karmic, like I said the documentation
does point to that.
On another note could you be a gentleman and ping someone to get some
ball rolling on other bug report since it will either be addressed
properly with the introduction of a decently working kernel on the
2.
Ah, I gracefully ignored that, since -c does not even work any more:
$ ubuntu-bug -c /tmp/linux-image.apport
Usage: /usr/bin/ubuntu-bug <.crash file>
Which Ubuntu release are you trying this on? In the initial description
you said 9.10 (karmic), but -c does not work in Karmic.
Also, the err
Actually no the switch is ubuntu-bug -c /tmp/linux-image.apport if the
-c is redundant then the documentation is wrong. If you use -c which is
for path then IT will bug out and this is how the documentations says
you should do it and thats where it craps out...
I remember saying I used the -c at l
I tried this:
$ ubuntu-bug /tmp/linux-image.apport
works fine for me. So this doesn't reproduce the apport crash.
As for the actual bug in Linux, I'm afraid that's not my area of
expertise. :-(
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You
like I said the bug only occurrs when your trying to "later" upload the
apport generated file and the error is a s documented.
the file is here http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35849216/linux-
image.apport
Pertaining to another bug no one has even touched or commeneted and is far more
serious then
I still cannot reproduce this, this works fine for me. Please attach the
generated .apport file which reproduces the crash. Thanks!
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
the bug does not exist when doing apport-cli -f -p linux the bug occurrs
when you do ubuntu-bug -c
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
I just tried "apport-cli -f -p linux" and it did not crash. Can you
replicate the crash? Please copy&paste the entire output.
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485238
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
the package was the linux-kernel and there was no crash report I was
gathering info to report another issue and apport failed to work as
expected.
I donthave anymore information relevant to this except what I posted
already which is irrelevant since this bug is independent of the other,
at least t
Can you please tell me which package you were trying to file the bug
against? Can you please attach the .crash file which caused the problem?
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
apport ValueError('need more than 1 value to unpack',)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: apport
- I collected a
+ I collected a report via cli like apport-cli -f -p kept it for
+ later sending as ubuntu-bug -c
+
+ this is being done in Karmic Koala 9.10 with shipping kernel and
+ backports kernel doesnt make a differnce. This bug ha
14 matches
Mail list logo
