** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
Title:
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
Title:
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Saying that, there is some work happening upstream to make it work with
2.0, so it might be possible for us to support it
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This isn't going to happen for Maverick, and considering we are now
beginning the transition to xulrunner 2.0 for Natty, I don't see this
happening at all.
** Changed in: Ubuntu Maverick
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
You r
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #591894
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591894
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591894
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Also affects: Ubuntu Maverick
Importance: Wishlist
Status: New
** Changed in: Ubuntu Maverick
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: Ubuntu Maverick
Assignee: (unassigned) => Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48040
** Also affects: sugar
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sugar
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
There's no reverse dependency because python-xpcom isn't packaged again
yet (see #352968 for the previous removal of python-xpcom). Catch-22.
See #459532 for an example of a package that requires python-xpcom. If you
decide not to ship python-xpcom, you effectively make Sugar (the desktop /
lear
I don't think this can happen for Lucid. If there is anything in the
archive that actually depends on python-xpcom, please let us know. I
don't see any rdepends for it at present in Lucid.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Milestone: ubuntu-10.04 => None
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Micah Gerst
unless the server team raises this as a priority, we wont get pyxpcom
for lucid.
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Missed Beta 2, will try for RC.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Milestone: ubuntu-10.04-beta-2 => ubuntu-10.04
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Since I like Virtualbox, I'll try to make a push for it :)
On 03/12/2010 02:19 PM, Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Micah Gersten
> wrote:
>
>> I'll try for beta 2 on this, but I'm not sure if we'll be able to do
>> this for Lucid.
>>
> That's unfortuna
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Micah Gersten
wrote:
> I'll try for beta 2 on this, but I'm not sure if we'll be able to do
> this for Lucid.
That's unfortunate, more because this is a LTS, but it's your time so
there's noting to complain about :)
Building virtualbox sdk depends on it, and bui
I'll try for beta 2 on this, but I'm not sure if we'll be able to do
this for Lucid.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Milestone: lucid-alpha-3 => ubuntu-10.04-beta-2
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Please file a new bug against Firefox for this with the output of the
warnings.
On 03/03/2010 08:32 PM, steubens wrote:
> the absence of this causes constant warning messages in repo builds of
> firefox once a second about parts of it that are present but "missing",
> ie. the files are on disk bu
the absence of this causes constant warning messages in repo builds of
firefox once a second about parts of it that are present but "missing",
ie. the files are on disk but its still complaining, affecting battery
life; about:buildconfig says python is still being enabled, but from
what i've seen i
** Tags added: needs-packaging
--
[needs-packaging] pyxpcom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman
18 matches
Mail list logo
