[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2011-07-14 Thread Brad Figg
This bug was filed against a series that is no longer supported and so is being marked as Won't Fix. If this issue still exists in a supported series, please file a new bug. This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu Kernel Team. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2010-08-16 Thread Tyler Hicks
Released in 2.6.36-rc1: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=c43f7b8fb03be8bcc579bfc4e6ab70eac887ab55 ** Changed in: ecryptfs Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2010-08-16 Thread Tyler Hicks
** Patch removed: "[PATCH] vfs/eCryptfs: Handle ioctl calls with unlocked and compat functions" https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/469664/+attachment/1360958/+files/0001-vfs-eCryptfs-Handle-ioctl-calls-with-unlocked-and-co.patch -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flag

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2010-05-05 Thread Steven
You should note that there is a very small potential security risk here. Most files don't have extended attributes on them and therefore any file having an extended attribute would raise a red flag. Due to the way ecryptfs works, these attributes would be visible (and settable/unsettable) in the en

Re: [Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2010-04-30 Thread Tyler Hicks
On 04/29/2010 05:17 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > lsattr is for on ext2 (and extX) files. ecryptfs just doesn't support the > EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS ioctl. We should be passing ioctls down to the lower file system. If the lower file system is extX, then lsattr will work. -- Inappropriate ioctl for devi

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2010-04-30 Thread Tyler Hicks
Updated and tested version of the fix. ** Patch removed: "[PATCH] eCryptfs: Handle ioctl calls with unlocked and compat functions" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35047418/0001-eCryptfs-Handle-ioctl-calls-with-unlocked-and-compa.patch ** Patch added: "[PATCH] vfs/eCryptfs: Handle ioctl calls w

Re: [Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2010-04-29 Thread Serge Hallyn
lsattr is for on ext2 (and extX) files. ecryptfs just doesn't support the EXT2_IOC_GETFLAGS ioctl. On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Lorenzo De Liso wrote: > ** Tags added: patch > > -- > Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469664 > You received

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2010-04-29 Thread Lorenzo De Liso
** Tags added: patch -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2010-04-27 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Adding a task for the Ubuntu kernel. Marking triaged/low. Upstream is aware of it, working the issue. Should land in a future kernel. ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: linux (U

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2010-02-17 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Marking the ecryptfs-utils Ubuntu package invalid. This will be solved kernel side. ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469664 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2009-11-03 Thread Tyler Hicks
Well, I may have jumped the gun. It looks like we should be passing this ioctl down to the lower fs in ecryptfs_ioctl. I'm looking into it now. ** Changed in: ecryptfs Assignee: (unassigned) => Tyler Hicks (tyhicks) ** Changed in: ecryptfs Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Change

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2009-11-03 Thread Tyler Hicks
Well, I may have jumped the gun. It looks like we should be passing this ioctl down to the lower fs in ecryptfs_ioctl. I'm looking into it now. ** Changed in: ecryptfs Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2009-11-03 Thread Tyler Hicks
eCryptfs doesn't support lsattr. It is an ext[345] specific tool that is shipped in e2fsprogs. It simply just isn't supposed to work on eCryptfs. -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469664 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2009-11-03 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Tyler- Ideas? -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2009-11-03 Thread Dustin Kirkland
kirkl...@x200:~$ lsattr .profile lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags on .profile I'm seeing the same thing. ** Package changed: ubuntu => ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: ecryptfs-utils (Ubuntu)

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2009-11-03 Thread James Dupin
tested on a different machine. have the same problem. It is related to the use of encrypted home or not. I believe it will be the same for files in any encrypted folder (will test). -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469664 You received this

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2009-11-02 Thread James Dupin
** Attachment added: "mtab" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34984556/mtab -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs m

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2009-11-02 Thread James Dupin
** Attachment added: "kern.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34984430/kern.log -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubunt

[Bug 469664] Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on

2009-11-02 Thread James Dupin
I did a clean install and it is still the same. all partitions in ext4 over LVM with encrypted /home/$USER and unencrypted for otheruser will try with ext3 -- Inappropriate ioctl for device while reading flags on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469664 You received this bug notification because