[Bug 466] Re: Snort 2.3 Inline Support

2007-03-23 Thread John Moser
Yeah, no Inline signatures available. As for signatures, Sourcefire releases the latest rules as of 7 days ago, even if the current subscription is 7 days old. A couple weeks ago, registered and subscribed matched because subscribed had no updates for a week. You do need to register (for free).

[Bug 466] Re: Snort 2.3 Inline Support

2007-03-23 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino
An updated Snort 2.6 would not be a free intrusion prevention system, even with inline support, as no signatures would be available. So it's rather useless (like an antivirus without signatures) and it would be only useful for those that pay up to Sourcefire for the latest ruleset. -- Snort 2.3 I

[Bug 466] Re: Snort 2.3 Inline Support

2006-06-26 Thread John Moser
Yeah, dependency on a (deprecated) library we don't have. I think snort 2.6 might rely on a different library for interfacing with iptables with inline support, but I'm not sure. I just know the old lib that 2.3 uses is long dead and I can't imagine 2.4 and 2.6 aren't updated. Aside from that, t

[Bug 466] Re: Snort 2.3 Inline Support

2006-06-26 Thread Barry deFreese
This should probably really go to Debian. Are there any ramifications of enabling inline support? Thanks. ** Changed in: snort (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info -- Snort 2.3 Inline Support https://launchpad.net/bugs/466 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com