[Bug 46081] Re: CIFS is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2024-12-09 Thread Massimiliano Pellizzer
The bug affects kernels which are no longer maintained ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 Title: CIFS i

[Bug 46081] Re: CIFS is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2024-12-09 Thread Massimiliano Pellizzer
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Massimiliano Pellizzer (mpellizzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 Title: CIFS is slow to read from, and cho

[Bug 46081] Re: CIFS is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2015-07-26 Thread Tiedemate
Sorry for the late reply, I somehow lost track of the bug. In the nmrantime I have a different NAS and Intel WiFi-Hardware, which is working very well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 46081] Re: CIFS is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2014-02-28 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Tiedemate, thank you for your comment. So your hardware and problem may be tracked, could you please file a new report with Ubuntu by executing the following in a terminal while booted into a Ubuntu repository kernel (not a mainline one) via: ubuntu-bug linux For more on this, please read the o

[Bug 46081] Re: CIFS is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2014-02-27 Thread Tiedemate
Still an issue for me on 13.10 with Atheros AR9285, reading from my SMB- NAS works fine but during writes, the whole system comes to a crawl, mouse is very choppy, enormous lags in doing anything. Very frustrating. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 46081] Re: CIFS is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2013-08-12 Thread Chris Moore
Comment #15 suggests it's still an issue in 13.04. How about we leave it another 7 years and see what happens? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 Title: CIFS is slow to rea

[Bug 46081] Re: CIFS is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2013-08-12 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Chris Moore, could you please confirm this issue exists with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ . If the issue remains, could you please run the following command in the development release from a Terminal (Applicati

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-04-15 Thread Jan Kovacik
I have Interpid box with RTL8169 chipped gigabit NIC from REPOTEC. When I am copying from samba share to XP machine transfer speed is about 38MB/s, but when I try to copy file TO samba share, the transfer speed is fluctuating between 500 KB and 8 MB/s. However, I am able to copy four files simulta

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-04-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Bob: your issue seems different: this bug is about bad performance in cifs compared to smbfs (and seems related to RTL81xx chips). Your bug is about a performance regression in CIFS from intrepid to Jaunty. Could you please file a separate bug so that it can be properly investigated ? Thanks in

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-03-29 Thread Bob Busters
ubuntu 9.04 beta nVidia Corporation MCP51 Ethernet Controller (rev a3) im getting slow speeds over samba like 68kB/s. it works ok in intrepid. -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-03-27 Thread Thierry Carrez
Really seems to be a realtek driver problem: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4889 Anyone with a RTL81xx chipset reproducing it in intrepid or jaunty ? -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 You received this bug no

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-01-04 Thread Jean Roberto Souza
I was making one transfer now, from my Ubuntu 8.04 to my XP and noticed the slow transfer. Here I am reading this bug and reporting that it still exist. I'm looking for a solution but until now I only found bug reports. -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs https

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2009-01-04 Thread Jean Roberto Souza
I was making one transfer now, from my Ubuntu 8.04 to my XP and noticed the slow transfer. Here I am reading this bug and reporting that it still exist. I'm looking for a solution but until now I only found bug reports. -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs https

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2008-11-12 Thread Ben Hodgetts (Enverex)
Thought it may be worth adding, I'm using Gentoo with a Realtek Gigabit onboard adapter and getting ~3MB/s throughput too (when transfering to a Samba share). -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 You received this bug notifi

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2008-08-29 Thread Huygens
I also had the experience yesterday. I was transfering a 6.5GB file (VM image) from my MacBook (using Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger) to my PC (using Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron). I was using the wireless connection (54Mb/s rt61pci), so a theorical 6.4MB/s. Such a transfer should in theory take about 17 min. I

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2008-01-06 Thread Alan Mc
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs ma

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2007-08-31 Thread alex108
There's perhaps a similar bug report about samba. In both cases I believe the slowdown happens because of the way samba interacts with ethernet drivers. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/84782 analogue - realtek, linksys and trendnet perhaps using realtek chipset/driver, which s

[Bug 46081] Re: cifs is slow to read from, and choppy to write to, compared to smbfs

2007-07-29 Thread analogue
Ditto. Just setup home network with gigabit ethernet and everything flies except for samba. Using realtek driver w. linksys card and trendnet card. Very frustrating trying to figure out why samba performance is so slow. Simultaneous file transfers over samba seem to speed up significantly but when