[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-10-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package lazr.restfulclient - 0.12.0-2ubuntu0.1 --- lazr.restfulclient (0.12.0-2ubuntu0.1) quantal-proposed; urgency=low * debian/patches/concurrency_fixes_rev_122.patch: backport rev 122: Creates AtomicFileCache as a parent class for MultipleRepresentat

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-10-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package lazr.restfulclient - 0.12.0-1ubuntu1.1 --- lazr.restfulclient (0.12.0-1ubuntu1.1) precise-proposed; urgency=low * debian/patches/concurrency_fixes_rev_122.patch: backport rev 122: Creates AtomicFileCache as a parent class for MultipleRepresentat

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-10-31 Thread Brian Murray
I also got the test case working and the verification done in Precise. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45941

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-10-31 Thread Brian Murray
I was able to recreate this on Quantal, and verify the fix, but I had to create a bash script with the test case and run it 2 or 3 times in a row. ** Tags removed: removal-candidate ** Tags added: verification-done-quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-10-31 Thread Brian Murray
I tried creating this bug on Precise using the test case provided and was unsuccessful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459418 Title: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-06-14 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/precise/lazr.restfulclient /precise-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459418 Title: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by process

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-06-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello James, or anyone else affected, Accepted lazr.restfulclient into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lazr.restfulclient/0.12.0-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-05-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/quantal-proposed/lazr.restfulclient -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459418 Title: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads) To manage

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-05-16 Thread Dave Walker
Hello James, or anyone else affected, Accepted lazr.restfulclient into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lazr.restfulclient/0.12.0-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-05-08 Thread William Grant
** No longer affects: launchpad -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459418 Title: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads) To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-03-01 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Uploaded SRU package to quantal-proposed... ** Changed in: lazr.restfulclient (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459418 Title: Ca

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-03-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~mathieu-tl/ubuntu/quantal/lazr.restfulclient/sru- concurrency -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459418 Title: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-02-22 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
** Description changed: [Impact] Concurrency issues in lazr.restfulclient are affecting some processes used by various teams; including Foundations, PS integration, etc. The most affected users are those who make heavy use of scheduled tasks around launchpadlib (see bug 513116); where diff

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-02-22 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
** Description changed: + [Impact] + Concurrency issues in lazr.restfulclient are affecting some processes used by various teams; including Foundations, PS integration, etc. + The most affected users are those who make heavy use of scheduled tasks around launchpadlib (see bug 513116); where diff

[Bug 459418] Re: Cache is not safe for concurrent use (by processes or threads)

2013-02-22 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Let's SRU this to Quantal and Precise; they're both 0.12.0, so just applying the particular diff should be good. ** Also affects: lazr.restfulclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: lazr.restfulclient (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: Ne