[Bug 457976] Re: maximal mount count but no fsck

2009-10-22 Thread Ernst Zlo
Thank you, it's gone! Sorry for the trouble! -- maximal mount count but no fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://list

[Bug 457976] Re: maximal mount count but no fsck

2009-10-22 Thread Johan Kiviniemi
You have a zero value in the fs_passno field. Quoting the fstab(5) man page: If the sixth field is not present or zero, a value of zero is returned and fsck will assume that the filesystem does not need to be checked. If setting it to a number greater than zero doesn’t fix the problem, please re

Re: [Bug 457976] Re: maximal mount count but no fsck

2009-10-22 Thread Ernst Zlo
Yes: # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid -o value -s UUID' to print the universally unique identifier # for a device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name # devices that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5). # # proc

[Bug 457976] Re: maximal mount count but no fsck

2009-10-22 Thread Johan Kiviniemi
Is the sdb5 partition in /etc/fstab? -- maximal mount count but no fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu

[Bug 457976] Re: maximal mount count but no fsck

2009-10-22 Thread Ernst Zlo
** Attachment added: "max_mount_count" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34135971/max_mount_count ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34135972/Dependencies.txt -- maximal mount count but no fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457976 You received this bug not