[Bug 45309] Re: sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications

2006-07-07 Thread Cyclops
Paul: ideal: drop sun-java until Sun solves the issues. good enough: publicly campaign Sun to solve the issues or drop sun-java if unresolved for a certain period. so so: publicly campaign Sun to solve the issues Since ideal is sometimes the enemy of good, a good compromise seems, to me, to be th

[Bug 45309] Re: [Bug 45309] Re: sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications

2006-07-07 Thread Paul Sladen
Cyclops: Can you recommend how we should move forward with this? -- sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications https://launchpad.net/bugs/45309 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 45309] Re: sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications

2006-07-07 Thread Cyclops
Dennis: now that is a nice excuse! People disagree (without any kind of ground, much less a solid one) with me and as such I can't consider them fooled? Neat. I guess you should read the COC and understand it, not merely memorize its URL. People, get this: Sun's poising itself with this license t

[Bug 45309] Re: [Bug 45309] Re: sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications

2006-07-05 Thread Dennis Kaarsemaker
Cyclops: please read http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct and adhere to these basic guidelines. -- sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications https://launchpad.net/bugs/45309 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 45309] Re: sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications

2006-07-05 Thread Cyclops
In the fscking FAQ http://download.java.net/dlj/DLJ-FAQ-v1.2.txt right in the first paragraph. If they really intended to address the difficulties they would update the license, not the FAQ. It's disgusting to see people fooled like this. -- sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications https://la

[Bug 45309] Re: [Bug 45309] Re: sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications

2006-07-04 Thread Matthias Klose
Cyclops schrieb: > Since when does this make for a "fix"? The FAQ itself says its > worthless. > > where do you find that? -- sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications https://launchpad.net/bugs/45309 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/l

[Bug 45309] Re: sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications

2006-07-04 Thread Cyclops
Since when does this make for a "fix"? The FAQ itself says its worthless. -- sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications https://launchpad.net/bugs/45309 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 45309] Re: sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications

2006-07-04 Thread Matthias Klose
1.5.0-07 now contains the FAQ as part of the license file and should clarify your issues. ** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released -- sun-java5 dlj license needs clarifications https://launchpad.net/bugs/45309 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub