[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Alexander Sack
got something more or less similar for dell bluetooth: bug 445462 -- dell-bluetooth - BT applet visible even without any adapter being present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Martin Pitt
> assuming that turning off bluetooth in bios is similar to turning on a hw killswitch I think it's stronger than that. When I turn it off in the BIOS, it doesn't appear anywhere in udev/kernel. If I killswitch my wifi, it still appears in iwlist, but you can't use it. > i wonder what you get if

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Martin Pitt
$ bluetooth-applet -d ** Message: adding killswitch idx 2 state 2 ** Message: Reading of RFKILL events failed ** Message: killswitch 2 is 2 ** Message: killswitches state 2 ** Message: killswitch 2 is 2 ** Message: killswitches state 2 -- BT applet visible even without any adapter being present h

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Janne Hyötylä
See also Bug #445462 for more confusion of the bluetooth states by gnome-bluetooth -- BT applet visible even without any adapter being present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Alexander Sack
besides from that getting the bluetooth-applet console output would be helpful as there are a bunch of g_message statements surrounding rfkill status et al -- BT applet visible even without any adapter being present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445326 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Alexander Sack
assuming that turning off bluetooth in bios is similar to turning on a hw killswitch, i wonder what you get if you add a cat $i/state to the for loop? -- BT applet visible even without any adapter being present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445326 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Or hang on, this is just for what the killswitch _can_ control. I don't actually have any adapter: $ udevadm trigger --verbose --dry-run --subsystem-match=bluetooth $ If I plug in my usb bluetooth dongle, your command adds a new one: Device Name: hci0 Type: bluetooth and now udev also knows

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Done: Device Name: phy0 Type: wlan Device Name: dell-wifi Type: wlan Device Name: dell-bluetooth Type: bluetooth - So it seems the BIOS does not quite disable it as much as it ought to. -- BT applet visible even without

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Alexander Sack
please run: for i in /sys/class/rfkill/rfkill*; do echo Device; echo -n " Name: "; cat $i/name; echo -n " Type: "; cat $i/type; done and see if you get any bluetooth type killswitches. -- BT applet visible even without any adapter being present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445326 You recei

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Some discussion with Alexander showed that this probably wasn't a 2.8.1 regression, but was triggered with fixing the /dev/rfkill permissions. Now g-b displays the applet if the number of adapters is greater than 0 (should be false here), OR a killswitch is present. This logic seems slightly broke

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Martin Pitt
This is even more confusing since the applet allows me to "Enable bluetooth", but there is no physical way to do so :-) ** Changed in: gnome-bluetooth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Tags added: regression-potential -- BT applet visible even without any adapter being present https:/

[Bug 445326] Re: BT applet visible even without any adapter being present

2009-10-07 Thread Martin Pitt
I suspect this was a regression in gnome-bluetooth (2.28.1-0ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low * new upstream release 2.28.1 - noteworthy changes: - bgo:595845 - The applet shows wrong connection information (LP: #440235) - bgo:595593 - Make sure pairing agents only bind to default adapter