[Bug 439589] Re: Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue

2009-11-17 Thread Fabrice Coutadeur
As stated in the last comment, closing the bug report. ** Changed in: syncevolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: syncevolution (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439589 You

[Bug 439589] Re: Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue

2009-10-01 Thread David Sugar
It might be something strange I had on my end at the time I did a test build, or some more recent change in the type in one of the dependent libraries that also fixed this, because I think uri->scheme was not originally a const char *. I will re-confirm that it still breaks without this, otherwise

[Bug 439589] Re: Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue

2009-09-30 Thread fabrice_sp
Arghhh: launchpad lost my comment :-/ I've not been able to reproduce the compilation error you're fixing: the package builds fine in a sbuild environment and it does not appear as failing at http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~wgrant/rebuild-ftbfs-test/test-rebuild-20090909-karmic.html . Can you el

[Bug 439589] Re: Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue

2009-09-30 Thread fabrice_sp
** Changed in: syncevolution (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: syncevolution (Ubuntu) Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => fabrice_sp (fabricesp) -- Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439589 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 439589] Re: Fails to build on Karmic, tiny gcc 4.4 issue

2009-09-30 Thread David Sugar
This is a debdiff to fix build failures for syncevolution. It is a tiny change for gcc 4.4 fussyness, and did not seem worth doing a patch system for, especially since it should be pushed upstream to the source maintainer... ** Attachment added: "syncevolution.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlib