Hi there.
Could you please test the situation with the linux-libertine package
that I have uploaded to my PPA? You can see the pertinent information
at:
https://launchpad.net/~rbrito/+archive/ppa
I am only providing OTF fonts from now on.
Regards.
--
You received this bug notification bec
** Changed in: linux-libertine (Debian)
Status: Unknown => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421550
Title:
[Karmic] Linux Libertine fonts wrongly defined/set up
To m
AFAIK this bug is fixed in Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic" final version (ttf-
linux-libertine package 4.4.1-3 contains patch from Chris Lawrence,
could someone check if this bug is reproducible with Ubuntu 9.10 final?
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #523186
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
** Also affects: baltix
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[Karmic] Linux Libertine fonts wrongly defined/set up
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
Hi!
Getting used to a new package is not always a thing one can do in
a week while also following other duties and real life. If you want a
quick solution, the easiest thing would be to provide a patch!
However there seems to be one ready to rename the bold font back
to the name w
Is there any movement/progress on this bug?
To reiterate, this is not about whether the TrueType variant has a
fontname of 'Linux Libertine' or 'Linux Libertine O'. It's about the
_inconsistency_ between different faces of the font -- the bold face is
named 'Linux Libertine' whereas the regular,
Further to the above: if you examine the .ttf files using Font Viewer,
the font name for LinLibertine_Bd.ttf is given as 'Linux Libertine,
Bold' whereas the others are named 'Linux Libertine O', whether it's
'Linux Libertine O, Regular', 'Linux Libertine O, Bold Italic' or
whatever.
In the latest
