Re: [Bug 421550] [NEW] [Karmic] Linux Libertine fonts wrongly defined/set up

2009-09-01 Thread Joseph Wakeling
Christoph Egger wrote: > Removing the 'O' from the fontname for the TrueType Variant is > explicitely advokated in the sourcepackage upstream ships so I won't > change the Name for the ttf Variant back. Well, the problem is that the bold variant of the font has the O removed (which I agree i

Re: [Bug 421550] [NEW] [Karmic] Linux Libertine fonts wrongly defined/set up

2009-09-01 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi all! I recently took over maintenance of the linux-libertine package in Debian. Removing the 'O' from the fontname for the TrueType Variant is explicitely advokated in the sourcepackage upstream ships so I won't change the Name for the ttf Variant back. However I'm cur

[Bug 421550] [NEW] [Karmic] Linux Libertine fonts wrongly defined/set up

2009-08-30 Thread Joseph Wakeling
Public bug reported: There are some errors in the setup/definition of the Linux Libertine fonts in Karmic. Specifically: (i) Linux Libertine O bold registers as a different font ('Linux Libertine'). (ii) Selecting 'bold' for Linux Libertine O in OpenOffice actually results in bold italic be