> best would probably be not a plain sync, but a hard dependency on the
non-dfsg-free docs (they are fsf-free)
OK, please upload a merge instead then.
Anyway, this would essentially mean to switch emacs in karmic from 22 to
23, since it builds the new metapackage, no? This means a Feature freeze
best would probably be not a plain sync, but a hard dependency on the
non-dfsg-free docs (they are fsf-free)
--
Sync emacs23 23.1+1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
discussion from the ubuntu-elisp team:
http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-
el...@lists.launchpad.net/msg00013.html
--
Sync emacs23 23.1+1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
This builds a package in main (emacs), so requires a main sponsor.
--
Sync emacs23 23.1+1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
** Changed in: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Sync emacs23 23.1+1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
I don’t know whether this is how the Ubuntu maintainers want to handle this,
but I didn’t see any open bugs about emacs23, and a sync from Debian seems like
a reasonable starting point. There’s a test build of the Debian package in my
PPA for Karmic, and it works fine as far as I can tell: