** Changed in: openipmi (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406263
Title:
Please merge openipmi 2.0.16-1(main) from debian unstable(main)
To ma
** Changed in: openipmi (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
Please merge openipmi 2.0.16-1(main) from debian unstable(main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Too late for karmic. Marking Won't Fix.
** Branch unlinked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/openipmi
** Changed in: openipmi (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
Please merge openipmi 2.0.16-1(main) from debian unstable(main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406263
You received this bug notificati
Please review the changes and make up your mind.
Unsubscribing sponsors team for now.
--
Please merge openipmi 2.0.16-1(main) from debian unstable(main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
yes daniel but I opened this bug a long time back
m unsure of its status now as karmic has reached FF
Regards
--
Please merge openipmi 2.0.16-1(main) from debian unstable(main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
If there's a very good reason to have the new upstream version we will
consider it.
http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/ for example is a good indicator
for things that we should probably have.
Is this merge important or not considering the release in a few weeks?
--
Please merge openipmi 2.0
change forwarded to debian
Regards
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #539416
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539416
** Also affects: openipmi (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539416
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Please
okay matthias and seb
sorry for that.. I work and test only those packages which are mostly
new upstream versions in debian containing fair amount of changes
Will curb myself down and forward that change to debian
Regards
--
Please merge openipmi 2.0.16-1(main) from debian unstable(main)
https
I agree with Sebastien in the general sense. Only specific packages
should now be picked from Debian and merged if relevant. We're focusing
on stabilizing the packages for Karmic for now.
That being said for this specific package (openipmi) and this new
version I think the merge is worth having in
you didn't get the point of my comment, the issue is that your are
flooding the sponsor queue with new version updates, while you work is
appreciate we do stop autosync on debian for a reason which is that we
want to focus on stabilization now and not try to get every new version,
do we really need
yes seb its a new upstream version with the following upstream changelog
excerpt
2009-03-16 Corey Minyard
* configure.in: Move to version 2.0.16. It's been a while and
a release is a good idea, I think.
2009-01-16 Corey Minyard
* lib/normal_fru.c: An I
thank you for your work there but how do decide what to update, you seem
to work on a lot of updates but there is a reason the autosyncs are
stopped that's not to play catching up manually now but to focus on
stabilization, is there any change worth having there?
** Changed in: openipmi (Ubuntu)
** Attachment added: "debian > ubuntu diff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29659826/debian.debdiff
** Changed in: openipmi (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/openipmi
--
Please merge openipmi 2.0.16-1(main) from debian unstable(main)
https://bugs.laun
13 matches
Mail list logo
