re comment 19: the performance is of course as unstable as always. But
why should I care?
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
** Description changed:
+ Problems with http://packages.ubuntu.com should be reported at
+ https://rt.ubuntu.com/ and not be discussed on launchpad.
+ Username/Password is ubuntu/ubuntu. For more information, read comment
+ #19.
+
Unfortunately, http://packages.ubuntu.com is having unstable per
This is *NOT* a problem that should be reported in Ubuntu. Please read
comment 19, these issues should be reported in RT, not Launchpad.
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
i am experiencing problems (connection dropped) recently... should i
report a new bug or is this still related to the problem discussed here?
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Ok, I got bored of receiving the irrelevant bugmail (no, marking a task
as Invalid doesn't stop the bugmail) so I took the trouble of reporting
this issue to the correct place where the people concerned actually
track issues.
The issue has been closed today with the comment "This issue has been
ta
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
And the site is again offline for several hours now. Frank, if I were
you, I would be very embarrassed to have my name displayed on that page.
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
Apologies, it appears I've skimmed over the report a little too quickly.
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
Jacob, may I kindly suggest you actually READ a ticket before closing
it? Thank you. The reason you (IMHO incorrectly) give for closure has
been already discussed. Reopening.
Ubuntu is more than just the packages it ships. This is a valid
concern, Frank HAS been contacted. Closing (as opposed
>From packages.ubuntu.com (up now):
Please contact Frank Lichtenheld if you encounter
any problems!
Removing Ubuntu as it is not an issue with the distribution itself.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Invalid
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
It is down again. Sigh.
According to this thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=844355
and in particular, this linked message:
http://blog.djpig.de/2008/06/13
then Canonical does host packages.ubuntu.com. Therefore, filing a bug in
an Ubuntu tracker is the correct thing to do. I can
packages.ubuntu.com seems to have been down from at least 07:45 GMT
today 21 Aug 2009 and is still down now 9:15 GMT. Confirmed down by
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/packages.ubuntu.com
packages.ubuntu.com is an extremely valuable resource to me and, I
suspect, most other Ubuntu sysadmins. Th
Thanks feranick for your input. As has been pointed out previously,
Frank is already cc'd to this bug report.
Let me grab the opportunity to add that the site is still fairly
unstable these days.
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this
If I can add my modest contribution to this bug report... At the bottom
of any packages.ubuntu.com pages there is an email address in case of
problems with that specific part of the website:
"To report a problem with the web site, e-mail fr...@lichtenheld.de"
I am not sure if that has been done,
The apache process seems to be back up, but the returned results are
still broken. All searches return empty sets (see attached Screenshot).
** Attachment added: "puc-search.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29633960/puc-search.png
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.laun
Matthew East wrote:
> However, we have a rather fundamental difference of opinion about the
> purpose of a bug tracker.
I'm not convinced it's that fundamental. But I don't think the purpose
of a bug tracker exhausts itself in communication from reporter to dev.
One could use personal email fo
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Rolf
Leggewie wrote:
> reopening again, this time in generic "Ubuntu" task which should keep
> everybody happy including the "Ubuntu Website" team. Jonathan, may I
> kindly suggest you do the same next time instead of simply closing an
> obviously valid issue?
It'
s/Jonathan/Matthew/
my sincere apologies
--
packages.ubuntu.com is flakey recently
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/405904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
"ubuntu-website" doesn't sound so wrong at first sight. But I guess
that project is more concerned with content?
Anyways, the Sysadmins are already cc'd to this ticket.
reopening again, this time in generic "Ubuntu" task which should keep
everybody happy including the "Ubuntu Website" team. Jon
20 matches
Mail list logo
