> Do you want us to change *every* file (several thousands?) changing the
copyright statement there? No.
In the 21st century, equipped with such amazing tools as perl (etc), doing this
when building the ubuntu package should not mean a problem.
Would you please explain shortly, why it does.
--
** Changed in: texlive-extra (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
texlive depends on docs that take up more space than the software
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401545
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
On Mo, 14 Jun 2010, Callum Macdonald wrote:
> Here's what I believe to be a copy of LPPL version 1.3c to which you refer:
> http://www.latex-project.org/lppl/lppl-1-3c.txt
Yes.
> Are you willing to explain on what basis you feel this license prohibits
> distribution of a Compiled Work without the
Here's what I believe to be a copy of LPPL version 1.3c to which you refer:
http://www.latex-project.org/lppl/lppl-1-3c.txt
Are you willing to explain on what basis you feel this license prohibits
distribution of a Compiled Work without the accompanying documentation
components?
Under clause 2, d
Hi Callum,
On So, 13 Jun 2010, Callum Macdonald wrote:
> Norbert, you said this has been discussed on the Debian bug tracking
> system and debian tex-maint mailing list. Is that correct?
Right.
> I found a bug, but I'm struggling to find anything in the mailing list.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
= Personal experience =
I wanted to install lyx and was horrified to see the download would be 438MB
which would translate to 745MB of disk usage. After a little investigation, it
turns out more than 70% of the download and almost 60% of the disk space was
documentation. I looked through all th
On Di, 23 Mär 2010, Shark Bay Technical Services wrote:
> This bug is not invalid, as per the The Debian Policy Manual the
> documentation files should be "Suggests" not recommends
> have reset status to incomplete. please do not change to invalid without
> discussion first.
This bug is *INVALI
This bug is not invalid, as per the The Debian Policy Manual the documentation
files should be "Suggests" not recommends
have reset status to incomplete. please do not change to invalid without
discussion first.
** Changed in: texlive-extra (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Incomplete
--
texl
Yes but unfortunately the default is to automatically install recommends.
Documentation of this type should always be a suggests.
Otherwise it WILL ALL WAYS be installed unless a user removes it by hand.
Even an update can cause it to be installed.
Not very sensible.
Recommends should only be for
Documentation is only recommended. If you want to save space, install
with aptitude -R.
** Changed in: texlive-extra (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
texlive depends on docs that take up more space than the software
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401545
You received this bug notificati
--
texlive depends on docs that take up more space than the software
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401545
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
On Fr, 20 Nov 2009, Eric wrote:
> The Debian Policy Manual, Chapter 7, defines a Recommends as a "strong,
> but not absolute, *dependency*" (emphasis added.) These documentation
> packages should be Suggests, defined as packages that "can perhaps
> enhance its usefulness, but that installing this o
The Debian Policy Manual, Chapter 7, defines a Recommends as a "strong,
but not absolute, *dependency*" (emphasis added.) These documentation
packages should be Suggests, defined as packages that "can perhaps
enhance its usefulness, but that installing this one without them is
perfectly reasonable"
13 matches
Mail list logo
