[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2010-09-06 Thread bashologist
I think this is a similar bug. HISTSIZE and HISTFILESIZE is being ignored when export the variables in ~/.bashrc. How can I set these variables so they work? Very annoying problem since I use my terminal a lot. Are there any workarounds? -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore https:/

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2010-06-03 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Lesmana, thank you for your work. I should have read your closing comment more carefully, you already pointed to bug 189881. Thanks. -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397230 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2010-06-03 Thread Rolf Leggewie
FWIW, I don't really consider this bug fixed. The question is where the bug is, whether it's wishlist, regression or whatnot. I currently don't see a way to avoid $ history | cut -b 8-|sort|uniq -c|sort -n|tail -n 3 19 ping www.google.de 25 bg 26 sudo gnome-ppp As long as that i

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2010-06-03 Thread Lesmana Zimmer
i can confirm that this bug is fixed Rolf Leggewie said in comment #9 that he mistakenly assumed HISTCONTROL to affect the history file, which it does not, and confirmed that he sees the bug as fixed. the mailing list discussion linked by reini in comment #11 also revolves around HISTCONTROL not

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-12-01 Thread reini
I just stumbled across the following: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html /bug-bash/2007-05/msg00016.html So it seems that the current behaviour is intended, even if I think that it is annoying. -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397230 You received

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-12-01 Thread reini
Regarding comment #3: HISTCONTROL is colon-separated, not semicolon- separated. HISTCONTROL used to work on .bash_history. I liked that behaviour since it minimised the .bash_history file's size allowing for more commands to be remembered. (It also stopped duplicates from cluttering the file.) S

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-08-26 Thread Rolf Leggewie
I have to concede that I may be understanding the meaning of HISTCONTROL incorrectly. If HISTCONTROL does not affect ~/.bash_history at all, then I think this bug is fixed. In any case, I think it's better to verify with those involved. There's no rush. -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not w

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-08-26 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Matthias, what is your problem? Why do you close again prematurely? I told you that IIRC I had tested bash 4 and indeed the problem is not fixed. Reopening again. $ set|grep HISTCON HISTCONTROL=erasedups $ sort ~/.bash_history | uniq -d -c | sort -n | grep google 2 host www.google.de

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-08-24 Thread Matthias Klose
> bash 4 is not yet in karmic. no, by the time of your email, it was and it is. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397230 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-08-24 Thread Rolf Leggewie
bash 4 is not yet in karmic. reopening. I believe I aslso tested this with bash4 where it wasn't fixed for me. I think it should have been common courtesy to ask those who stepped forward as being affected for confirmation the problem is indeed fixed before closing prematurely. ** Changed in: ba

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-08-24 Thread Matthias Klose
checked in karmic with bash-4.0, works as expected ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397230 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-08-04 Thread Rolf Leggewie
HISTSIZE seems to be frequently ignored, too, and the history file cut back to 500 lines. Together, this can become quite annoying, slightly upping priority. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Low => Medium ** Tags added: karmic -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore http

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-08-02 Thread Rolf Leggewie
I can confirm this problem for Karmic although I believe it has been around at least since Jaunty. Maybe this has something to do with unsuccessful commands not being saved in the history anymore? This is something I realized recently to have happened. I think it's arguable whether that is a bug

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-07-09 Thread Brian Murray
I was unable to recreate this using bash version 3.2-5ubuntu2 on karmic. I used both 'ignoreboth' and 'ignoredups' as values for HISTCONTROL. Notice that 'ignoredups' does not have a 2nd 'e' in it. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does n

[Bug 397230] Re: ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore

2009-07-08 Thread Daniel Hahler
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28833631/Dependencies.txt -- ignoredupes in HISTCONTROL does not work anymore https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397230 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.