[Bug 387384] Re: main inclusion report for Arora

2009-07-03 Thread Alexander Sack
tentatively acked after dicussion in #ubuntu-desktop meeting. in general i dont like having two browsers in the main install. It puts extra load on the security team - which could be avoided if there is no technical reason for it (which seems to be the case here). However, we need to support webkit

[Bug 387384] Re: main inclusion report for Arora

2009-06-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I've moved this to main to get it in for the next alpha, let me know if a decision gets made. -- main inclusion report for Arora https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mail

[Bug 387384] Re: main inclusion report for Arora

2009-06-22 Thread Jonathan Riddell
It'll complement Konqueror for the moment, essentially for political reasons. It'll be the primary browser (if upstream implements the various items we request in the KubuntuKarmicWebbrowser spec). We like to have a browser which can read slashdot. ** Changed in: arora (Ubuntu) Status: I

[Bug 387384] Re: main inclusion report for Arora

2009-06-22 Thread Alexander Sack
The description says that this is a webkit based browser. Will this replace konqueror or why does kubuntu need a second browser? Please give more background on the rationale. ** Changed in: arora (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- main inclusion report for Arora https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 387384] Re: main inclusion report for Arora

2009-06-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
** Changed in: arora (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alexander Sack (asac) -- main inclusion report for Arora https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu