http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/2009-April/013166.html
for desktop usage, this kind of scenario is very common, should have a
workaround . at least its not a matter to hfs/hfs+ under OS X.
--
Dynamically mounted ext3 file systems are not writable by users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Project changed: hundredpapercuts => null
--
Dynamically mounted ext3 file systems are not writable by users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382074
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
>I wonder why this bug is marked invalid?
+1
It' seems to be true usability bug, maybe making it one of the hundred
pappercuts will help to resolve it?
--
Dynamically mounted ext3 file systems are not writable by users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382074
You received this bug notification b
I wonder why this bug is marked invalid? (I might be missing something
about status meanings though...)
I just had my sister complain to me that she is not able to backup her
photos to the external hard drive she just bought and formatted with
gparted. I'm afraid this needs to be addressed and fix
** Summary changed:
- Mounted ext3 file systems are not writable by users
+ Dynamically mounted ext3 file systems are not writable by users
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: hal
A friend of mine (an average Ubuntu Jaunty user) recently bought a new
internal SATA hard disk. Af
