This bug was fixed in the package squeak-vm - 1:3.9.8-3ubuntu1
---
squeak-vm (1:3.9.8-3ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low
* debian/{changelog/control}: rename source package squeak-vm to be
consistent with existing Debian and Ubuntu source packages
* debian/patches: added amd64.patch
I've just successfully compiled a VM for my 64bits system which doesn't
segfaults. I've used the subversion tree and applied the patch
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-
dev/attachments/20070531/8f30c82a/64bit-vm.obj (which is already
partially applied; force it to patch the other half
Hi,
That patch is against the Squeak-3.9-8 UNIX VM sources. If you are keen,
try and build the VM from scratch. It is quite easy assuming you
already know how to build stuff.
Here is the link to the VM sources:
http://ftp.squeak.org/3.9/unix-linux/Squeak-3.9-8.src.tar.gz
Note that you would pro
Ok I want to install squeak, it will not do to lack of squeak-vm.
>From reading this bug report there seems to be a solution.
So what is the fix/work-a-round?
Would someone please add instructions to this bug?
--
There is no squeak-vm for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36806
You received
** Changed in: squeak-vm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist => Medium
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
There is no squeak-vm for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bu
Thank you very much.
--
There is no squeak-vm for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi
oops, sorry about the double post...
--
There is no squeak-vm for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
Attached is the patch.
References:
1. http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4608
2. http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2007-May/001297.html
** Attachment added: "AMD64 fixes for squeak-vm"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9090453/squeak-3.9-8-amd64.patch
--
There is no squeak-vm fo
Attached is the patch.
References:
1. http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4608
2. http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2007-May/001297.html
** Attachment added: "AMD64 fixes for squeak-vm"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9090452/squeak-3.9-8-amd64.patch
--
There is no squeak-vm fo
Well, I have managed to compile a 64bit VM and successfully run an
image. The generic UNIX source just needs a small patch applied.
btw, those sources at `http://www.squeakvm.org/squeak64' are over 2
years old. It seems as though 64bit is now supported in the generic UNIX
source package.
--
The
I don't see any reason not to do that. But I'm far from an expert. If
this work it's ok to me. thank you
--
There is no squeak-vm for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-b
I should clarify. Is there a reason not to make the _32-bit binary
package_ available to amd64 users, especially since it's dependencies
are already in the amd64 pool? It could be squeak-vm-ia32 or something.
I'd be happy to package it up myself, but I'm not the maintainer :)
--
There is no squ
Mike Culbertson: "Is there a reason not to just use the 32-bit binary
since that is all that will be available for the forseeable future, and
there are no dependencies on the binary itself?"
You can do this yes. Thank you.
--
There is no squeak-vm for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36806
I should point out that a 64-bit Squeak is a big issue (according to my
smalltalking co-workers) far outside of the scope of Ubuntu. However,
the upstream 32-bit Squeak binary has no 32-bit dependencies other than
ia32-libs (confirmed on several debian-based systems). Is there a
reason not to ju
i'll happily mege any patches to make it build ...
--
There is no squeak-vm for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
Can we change this from being wishlist to something more critical? The
source files for amd64 obviously exist, is there no one capable of
building a package?
--
There is no squeak-vm for amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36806
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
16 matches
Mail list logo
