*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354036 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354036
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:33 +, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Isn't it "broken" by definition any time it tracebacks?
Well yes, but John meant 'the branch is missing important data', not
'bzr is broken' :)
-Rob
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354036 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354036
Isn't it "broken" by definition any time it tracebacks?
In any event, yes, this is a duplicate of bug #354036. Thanks for the
pointer.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 354036
ErrorFromSmart