I think stack-protector specific functions become 'required' in dynamic linker
only when certain constructions used in UDF.
If UDF is simple function like 'return sin(x)', this UDF loads perfectly either
with stack protector or without.
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF d
The bug appear in:
r...@ubuntu:~# dpkg -l | fgrep -i firebird2.1-classic
ii firebird2.1-classic 2.1.1.17910-release.ds1-1ubuntu1
Firebird Classic Server - an RDBMS based on
** Changed in: firebird2.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
firebird 2.1 compiled w
Only one difference between compilations is -fno-stack-protector (with
this option everything OK).
r...@ubuntu:~/rfunc/rfunc/source# gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) 4.3.3
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. Ther
** Attachment added: "This rfunc is .so that dont't work with firebird 2.1"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31746724/rfunc_dont_work
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Attachment added: "This rfunc is .so that works OK with firebird 2.1"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31746715/rfunc.so_work_ok
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received this bug notification because you are a m
rfunc was compiled on the same PC.
I will post my rfunc.so later (2-3 days) when i get access to that server.
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
i have tested with is leapYear and it worked
http://mapopa.blogspot.com/2008/07/to-use-udf-modules-in-ubuntulinux-
you.html
** Changed in: firebird2.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.
and that was tested with firebird2.1-classic
sudo apt-get install firebird2.1-classic
dpkg-reconfigure firebird2.1-classic to enable it
and then from flamerobin i have declared the function and worked without issues
as above
if you have an example please come to firebird-support
--
firebird
Library name: /usr/lib/firebird/2.1/UDF/fbudf.so
Entry point: isLeapYear
ISLEAPYEAR(
Timestamp by reference
)
returns:
Integer by value
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received this bug notification because
rfunc.so was compiled on another pc ? if so it's need an recompile
or how is done , could send an example for your udf
** Changed in: firebird2.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
it seems that firebird 2.1 super is already compiled with stack protector on
ubuntu 8.10 and ubuntu 9.04
you can check with the above command
i check now the firebird 2.1-classic
** Changed in: firebird2.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => In Progress
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without s
seems that fb_inet_server is not compiled with stack protection
objdump -CR /usr/lib/firebird/2.1/bin/fb_inet_server
/usr/lib/firebird/2.1/bin/fb_inet_server: file format elf32-i386
DYNAMIC RELOCATION RECORDS
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
08049ff0 R_386_GLOB_DAT__gmon_start__
0804a00
What is meaning of bug state 'fix released' ?
there is no bug, or bug will be closed on next build ?
please describe, or give me the link.
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received this bug notification because you a
Firebird is compiled with stack protection enabled by default (tested on
both 8.10 and 9.04)
objdump -CR /usr/lib/firebird/2.1/bin/fbserver | grep chk
0097c7c0 R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT __stack_chk_fail
** Changed in: firebird2.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
firebird
follow this thread
http://www.nabble.com/firebird-2.1-compiled-without-stack-protector%2C-so-UDF-dlopen-failed-td23430831.html
seems for me that firebird is build with stack protection by default , at least
this is on jaunty
i will check on intrepid too
** Changed in: firebird2.1 (Ubuntu)
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: firebird2.1-classic
firebird-2.1 classic is compiled with -fno-stack-protector,
so any third-party UDF compiled with default gcc options are not loaded by
firebird at runtime.
and firebird said (Exmple for TANH function in common rfunc
(htt
** Summary changed:
- firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF open failed
+ firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: firebird2.1-classic
firebird-2.1 classic is compiled with -fno-stack-protector,
so a
17 matches
Mail list logo
