[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2015-03-23 Thread Balazs Scheidler
I think there are other means to communicate the supportedness of packages, like the "Supported" field in the control file. We do have reports of the same effect, that installing syslog-ng is a hassle, just because of the this dependency, like: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/syslog-ng

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2013-01-15 Thread Trevor Joynson
I agree with @stevecs, this is rather annoying to hold the ubuntu- minimal package, then recompile my own with a one line fix in it's depends after each meta package update. I'm disappointed by politics being brought into this; isn't FOSS supposed to encourage choice? -- You received this bug not

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2012-12-21 Thread stevecs
3 years later (in this thread, and over 5 from the others) and this 'political battle' is still going on. Please resolve these dependancies. This has nothing to do with support, it is purely a dependancy linkage issue of the ubuntu-minimal package. This is a major pain when trying to run

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2009-08-08 Thread tgpae
I would personally suggest that sysklogd has sufficiently limited functionality that one could justify removing it from the supported system-log-daemon providers entirely. Doing that would cause people who were using it due to it being the default to automatically switch to the new default of rsys

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2009-08-05 Thread Rolf Leggewie
given that rsyslog is now the official choice in karmic, would an SRU be granted that allows installation of ubuntu-minimal and rsyslog on hardy for example? -- ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33394 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2009-07-15 Thread Andrew Pollock
Uqbar: see https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations- karmic-rsyslogd -- ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33394 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2009-07-15 Thread Uqbar
Why not syslog-ng? -- ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33394 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.c

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2009-07-15 Thread Colin Watson
Karmic will be switching to rsyslog. We don't intend to change the metapackage - doing so would actually make it harder to switch people over to a single different standard logging daemon, because the dependencies would still permit sysklogd so we'd end up supporting two logging daemons indefinite

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2008-11-13 Thread Andrew Pollock
Can Jaunty just switch to syslog-ng instead? Would that resolve the main issue for most people concerned? -- ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33394 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscr

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2008-11-13 Thread murgen
Can you resolve this bug please? -- ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33394 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2008-06-07 Thread tgpae
I agree with the logic that syslog-ng is not a supported piece of software, and thus using it instead of sysklogd makes ones system not supported. However, the current way the dependencies are specified removes all of whatever benefits the 'ubuntu-minimal' package has to anyone who knows syslog-ng

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2008-04-18 Thread Daniel Hahler
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => Wishlist Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33394 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscr

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2008-04-03 Thread Brent Newland
Moving Confirmed Status from bug 42555 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 42555 ubuntu-minimal should support recommends (was: syslog-ng causes ubuntu-minimal to be removed.) ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- ubuntu-minimal should depend on

[Bug 33394] Re: ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon

2008-04-02 Thread agent 8131
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 42555 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42555 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 42555 ubuntu-minimal should support recommends (was: syslog-ng causes ubuntu-minimal to be removed.) -- ubuntu-minimal should depend on system-log-daemon http