[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2012-11-30 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 6 comments from the remote bug at http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2011-02-04 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: icedtea Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 Title: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-21 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bug

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-21 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: icedtea Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-20 Thread Matthias Klose
another workaround is to pass -Xss1024k when running ant. ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package xom - 1.1-3ubuntu4 --- xom (1.1-3ubuntu4) jaunty; urgency=low * Revert "Update default-jdk -> default-jdk-builddep to resolve FTBFS", gcj isn't used in this package. * Workaround hotspot error by using the cacao VM. LP: #329903. -- Matthias

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-17 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: icedtea Status: Unknown => Confirmed -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-17 Thread Matthias Klose
** Bug watch added: Iced Tea Bugzilla #307 http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307 ** Also affects: icedtea via http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on per

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-17 Thread Matthias Klose
compile-core: [javac] Compiling 239 source files to /build/buildd/xom-1.1/build/classes [javac] [javac] [javac] The system is out of resources. [javac] Consult the following stack trace for details. [javac] java.lang.StackOverflowError [javac] at com.sun.tools.jav

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-11 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329903 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 329903] Re: xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on personal amd64

2009-03-11 Thread Chris Cheney
Matthias, This definitely looks like a bug in openjdk-6 after I have dug into it a bit more. I can compile fine on amd64 seemingly every time but compiling on i386 seems to fail every time. And since the buildds are i386 it fails there. Chris -- xom FTBFS in Jaunty on the i386 buildd but not on