[Bug 314681] Re: SysRq output not going to the console

2009-01-07 Thread Andy Whitcroft
It appears that this behaviour is as expected. It is entirly reasonable to want to trigger a sysrq and read it from the dmesg/syslog without spamming the console. The documentation is below par here, so I have pushed up some documentation updates to mainline to make this more obvious. ** Changed

[Bug 314681] Re: SysRq output not going to the console

2009-01-07 Thread Andy Whitcroft
As it is not clear what the correct behaviour is, and that documentation at a minimum is needed I have started a thread on lkml to discuss the correct option. -- SysRq output not going to the console https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314681 You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Bug 314681] Re: SysRq output not going to the console

2009-01-07 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Looking at the source this seems to have always been the way things were. That this is intentional. This is likely because some consoles are very slow (such as serial) and the output will be in dmesg at least. As turning loglevel up to do the dump (the equivalent of sysrq doing it automatically)

[Bug 314681] Re: SysRq output not going to the console

2009-01-07 Thread Andy Whitcroft
It seems that the header only behaviour is triggered by the loglevel of the kernel being low due to the kernel command line option 'quiet'. You can modify the running kernel loglevel using sysrq-8 and then later sysrq commands should be visible. You may want to return loglevel to normal later; sys

[Bug 314681] Re: SysRq output not going to the console

2009-01-07 Thread Andy Whitcroft
I can confirm the same behaviour here on my laptop. Hitting any sysrq combination outputs the header on the raw console and nothing else. The dmesg bufffer contains the full output. As a work around you migth be able to use dmesg directly to get the output? ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: