This bug was fixed in the package libraw1394 - 2.0.2-2ubuntu1
---
libraw1394 (2.0.2-2ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
* Merge from Debian unstable (LP: #311804), remaining changes:
- debian/README.Debian: Corrected file to use sudo instead of running
as root
libraw1394 (2.0.2
Thanks, I'll take care of sponsoring the libraw1394 merge.
libiec61883 happens to have become a sync now, no need to merge that.
There's also no need to generate debdiffs for reverse-dependencies -
since those changes will be trivial, Ubuntu developers will handle those
directly. If there are an
** Tags added: merge
--
Update libraw1394 to version 2.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li
A debdiff for the libiec61883 merge above.
** Attachment added: "libiec61883_1.2.0-0.1ubuntu1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26336174/libiec61883_1.2.0-0.1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
Update libraw1394 to version 2.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311804
You received this bug notification beca
A debdiff for the libraw1394 merge above.
** Changed in: libraw1394 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Attachment added: "libraw1394_2.0.2-2ubuntu1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26336167/libraw1394_2.0.2-2ubuntu1.debdiff
--
Update libraw1394 to version 2.0
https://bu
The merge for libraw/libiec is done. The merges are currently in REVU:
(Both are uploaded twice, because of jaunty->karmic mistake in changelog)
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=5639 - libraw1394
http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=5640 - libiec61883
I'd like request sponsorship
Yes, I have already tested building several major apps (like VLC,
ffado...) against libraw1394-2 and libiec61883-1.2 (copied from Debian)
locally on Jaunty. Everything seems to work without problems.
What has to be done to move them into Karmic? Should I proceed with a
merge procedure for libraw13
Karmic is now open; Артём, are you still interested in handling this
merge?
Unsubscribing ubuntu-main-sponsors for now since there's no sponsorable
merge here at present; please re-subscribe u-m-s again when this is
ready for sponsorship.
--
Update libraw1394 to version 2.0
https://bugs.launchpa
If it is okay to merge/test the 2.0 package and it's reverse
dependencides after the feature freeze, I'd be happy to do this.
** Tags added: upgrade
--
Update libraw1394 to version 2.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
This needs to be a merge:
http://patches.ubuntu.com/libr/libraw1394/libraw1394_1.3.0-4ubuntu1.patch
Also, changing the soname would require a lot of package rebuilds, and
testing them. (apt-cache rdepends libraw1394-8). Are you willing to
drive that process and test at least some of the reverse de
Checking the changelog, 2.0.2 is a license fix release. If 2.0.2 is in
experimental, then a sync would be preferable.
--
Update libraw1394 to version 2.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
debian experimental has 2.0.2 shouldn't that version be used for the
update rather?
** Changed in: libraw1394 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Update libraw1394 to version 2.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Attachment removed: "libraw1394_2.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21299412/libraw1394_2.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
** Attachment removed: "libraw1394_2.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21299457/libraw1394_2.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
Update libraw1394 to versio
Heres another update to bring it to 2.0.1. I changed the package soname
from -8 to -11 to match what is built. However, I did not make it
conflict/replace libraw1394-8 which may or may not be the right thing to
do.
** Attachment added: "libraw1394_2.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrari
Heres another update to bring it to 2.0.1. I changed the package soname
from -8 to -11 to match what is built. However, I did not make it
conflict/replace libraw1394-8 which may or may not be the right thing to
do.
** Attachment added: "libraw1394_2.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrari
Heres another update to bring it to 2.0.1. I changed the package soname
from -8 to -11 to match what is built. However, I did not make it
conflict/replace libraw1394-8 which may or may not be the right thing to
do.
** Attachment added: "libraw1394_2.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrari
** Attachment added: "libraw1394_2.0.0-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20767165/libraw1394_2.0.0-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
--
Update libraw1394 to version 2.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
17 matches
Mail list logo
