[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-05-23 Thread Echo Nolan
6.10.3 is in karmic. ** Changed in: ghc6 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302149 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

Re: [Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-03-24 Thread Ilmari Vacklin
2009/3/23 Andrey Zaitsev : > Should I mention eclipse or netbeans? Netbeans in Jaunty is version 6.5, which is the newest released version. -- [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302149 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-03-24 Thread Russel Winder
Andrey, I must support what Iain said here, your comment is not constructive: there is nothing wrong (per se) with the Ubuntu distro. Ubuntu is more like Debian Stable than Debian Testing, There is a freeze point of packages for each release (6 monthly for Ubuntu, every 18--36 months for Debian S

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-03-23 Thread Iain Lane
That is not helpful. The fact is that 6.10 landed in Debian too late for us to get it in for Jaunty. We will be able to get it in for Karmic, but there is a fair amount of work that goes into updating to a new version (rebuilding all dependent libs and applications), so if a new version is released

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-03-23 Thread Andrey Zaitsev
So far, so good, so what? 3 months passed and nothing happened... And that is not the only package frozen this way in its version. Hey, guys what's wrong with this distro??? Is it too much packages to carry on or what??? Should I mention eclipse or netbeans?? Where are you, maintainers??? -- [jau

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-03-23 Thread Ketil Malde
I'm just going to chime in and echo this request. Forcing users to install binary snapshots in order to compile recent software defeats the purpose of a distribution. I never quite understood how to create .debs, but I'm happy to test candidate packages, or whatever else is needed. -- [jaunty]

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-03-11 Thread Ilmari Vacklin
This is now in Debian unstable. -- [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302149 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://li

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-03-09 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: ghc6 (Debian) Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302149 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubu

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-02-26 Thread Russel Winder
Thanks for doing this to show it is possible (and should have been done for Jaunty :-) Having said this I downloaded the Linux build from the central Haskell website and installed that in /opt/ghc on all 5 of my Ubuntu boxes and it seems to be working fine. I wonder if this is what others who nee

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-02-26 Thread Someone561
I have build the 6.10 for intrepid in my ppa: https://launchpad.net/~someone561/+archive/ppa The one problem I had was that ghc6 depend on haddock and haddock on ghc6. But ghc6 build without haddock fine and after that I add again haddock as dependency. -- [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-02-15 Thread Russel Winder
Kari Pahula got 6.10 into Debian exprimental 5 days after the last comment, so someone cares. :-) 6.10 contains a lot of good stuff to do with multicore parallelism, It is a great shame that Ubuntu won't get this before 09.10 at the earliest now :-( -- [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstr

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-01-19 Thread Maduser
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #495126 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495126 ** Also affects: ghc6 (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495126 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-01-14 Thread StefanPotyra
Sorry to say this, but most probably this is not going to happen for jaunty, because we're lacking manpower to do so (I don't find the time for this task at the moment, and I'm not aware that anyone else in Ubuntu or Debian is working on 6.10 atm.). Any help would be greatly appreciated though! *

[Bug 302149] Re: [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream

2009-01-13 Thread Wouter Stomp
** Changed in: ghc6 (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None => ghc6 -- [jaunty] Please sync ghc6 with latest upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302149 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bug