** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
Add CONFIG_IKCONFIG kernel config support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294630
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 02:00:08PM -, Lethe wrote:
> OK, I understand to pros and cons of either. How can I close this?
I'll get it sorted out.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team) => Andy Whitcroft (apw)
--
Add CONFIG_IKCONFIG kernel config
OK, I understand to pros and cons of either. How can I close this?
Nick
--
Add CONFIG_IKCONFIG kernel config support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294630
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
For Ubuntu built and distributed kernels the config files in /boot are
going to be up to date as they are pushed out as part of the kernel
update. The reason not to include this in the runing kernel image is
that the data is loaded into kernel memory for the life of the runing
kernel, which is bas
Yes, but a config file in /boot doesn't mean (or proved to be) it is the
config file of the running kernel. /proc/config.gz will always be
correct.
The kernel option to add this is so trivial, I am surprised it isn't a
default option.
Nick
--
Add CONFIG_IKCONFIG kernel config support
https://b
