Re: [Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/03/09 at 18:33 -, Chiron wrote: > Thanks. For the cairo bug, would the solution then be to move version > 1.6.3 of libcairo-ruby into 8.10 since it seems to fix the earlier test > case? Yes, that could be a solution. The other solution is to fix it in Debian lenny, and use the fixed vers

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-17 Thread Chiron
Thanks. For the cairo bug, would the solution then be to move version 1.6.3 of libcairo-ruby into 8.10 since it seems to fix the earlier test case? -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293464 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
I reported this as a different debian bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519786 -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-14 Thread Chiron
Right, so its not a cairo bug at all, the problem I found with the 1.5.1 version seems to be a coincidence. It seems to be a glade bug? I removed a child from an eventbox in a gtk::dialogue, and then destroyed the dialogue. Test case, including 2 glade files, follows: <-> NG_PATH = "NewGa

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-14 Thread Chiron
I appear to have been mistaken about 1.6.3 not working. It *sort of* works. By that, I mean that the test case that I provided you with now works. My programme still doesn't, though. I'm working on extracting a piece of the programme for use as another test case for you. -- [BUG] object allocat

Re: [Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 14/03/09 at 19:48 -, Chiron wrote: > That doesn't crash in irb until I ^C the loop and type in 'exit' > > Running this as a script with ruby does make it crash, though: > > <-> > require 'cairo' > require 'stringio' > > i = 0; > 1000.times do > output = StringIO.new > surface =

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-14 Thread Chiron
installing libcairo-ruby1.8_1.6.3-1_i386.deb for sid from packages.debian.org didn't fix the problem -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-14 Thread Chiron
That doesn't crash in irb until I ^C the loop and type in 'exit' Running this as a script with ruby does make it crash, though: <-> require 'cairo' require 'stringio' i = 0; 1000.times do output = StringIO.new surface = Cairo::PDFSurface.new(output, 100, 100) context = Cairo::Context.

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-14 Thread Chiron
I should add that in the test case that I have provided, there is a lower bound (85 for me) below which the test case does not cause an error. -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293464 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Mmmh. In the debian bug ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487204 ), the following test case was provided: <-> require 'cairo' require 'stringio' i = 0; while true output = StringIO.new surface = Cairo::PDFSurface.new(output, 100, 100) context = Cairo::Context.new(

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-14 Thread Chiron
libcairo-ruby1.8 version is 1.5.1-1+lenny1 -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.u

Re: [Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 08/03/09 at 23:50 -, Chiron wrote: > Intrepid, up to data, with backports. > > I'm fairly certain its in cairo somewhere - I've narrowed the issue down > to a ruby class extending a Gtk::Drawable, using cairo to draw with it. > The drawing is fairly intensive, so it draws to an ImageSurface

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-08 Thread Chiron
Intrepid, up to data, with backports. I'm fairly certain its in cairo somewhere - I've narrowed the issue down to a ruby class extending a Gtk::Drawable, using cairo to draw with it. The drawing is fairly intensive, so it draws to an ImageSurface before drawing that to the control's surface, in ca

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-08 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On which version of Ubuntu ? -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com http

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-03-07 Thread Chiron
I am still having this issue in ruby programmes that do not pull in libxml, so I think that it is in at least one other ruby library. I suspect that it is in cairo or glade, since those are the two libraries that are being used at the time of the crash. Should this bug be reopened, or a new one cre

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2009-02-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
that was a libxml-ruby bug, that has been fixed in 0.5.2.0-3+lenny1 (on the Debian side). I'm not sure it's worth backporting the patch to hardy ** Changed in: ruby1.8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2008-11-05 Thread Niklas Hofer
Yes Chiron, it seems so. I uninstalled all gems one by one and reinstalled those I needed. libxml-ruby was the one causing troubles. -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2008-11-04 Thread Chiron
Thanks Niklas, so if what was suggested here ( http://www.ruby- forum.com/topic/161876 )is true, then it sounds like an issue with new GC API changes and old versions of various libraries. -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293464 You receiv

[Bug 293464] Re: [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase

2008-11-04 Thread Niklas Hofer
The same happens when starting a rails application with rails 2.1.0 installed from gems before the dist-upgrade from hardy to intrepid. -- [BUG] object allocation during garbage collection phase https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293464 You received this bug notification because you are a member of