[Bug 292487] Re: [needs-packaging] jHeidi

2009-02-13 Thread Brian Murray
*** This is an automated message *** This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug reports specification, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs- packaging bug reports have

[Bug 292487] Re: [needs-packaging] jHeidi

2008-11-14 Thread freshinstall
Will do. Sorry for the confusion. -- [needs-packaging] jHeidi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail

[Bug 292487] Re: [needs-packaging] jHeidi

2008-11-14 Thread Fred
Then it would be more apprioprate to change License to 'public domain' instead of 'freeware'. Freeware are usually proprietary closed-source software with restrictions that prevent you from modifying, disassembling, decompiling, etc. Also, it would be good if you put on the website, that it is pu

[Bug 292487] Re: [needs-packaging] jHeidi

2008-11-14 Thread freshinstall
Absolutely, the project is in the public domain. There are no restrictions. I should have explained that in my response. -- [needs-packaging] jHeidi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 292487] Re: [needs-packaging] jHeidi

2008-11-14 Thread Fred
So you mean that jHeidi is license-free software? * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License-free_software What freedoms do I have? * Freedom 0: The freedom to run the program for any purpose. * Freedom 1: The freedom to study and modify the program. * Freedom 2: The freedom to copy the program so yo

[Bug 292487] Re: [needs-packaging] jHeidi

2008-11-14 Thread freshinstall
I am the creator of jHeidi and I corrected the "license". I have no interest in any kind of license for my code. Why it should matter to someone who has no stake in my project is bizarre. I appreciate the offer of packaging however, jHeidi runs nicely by unzipping and executing a shell script.

[Bug 292487] Re: [needs-packaging] jHeidi

2008-11-14 Thread Fred
Someone changed the license from "GNU General Public License" to "freeware". HeidiSQL is under the GPL. So I was under the impression that jHeidi was so too. I am not sure if that is the case. If jHeidi is not FOSS, then I would like to retract this request. -- [needs-packaging] jHeidi https://

[Bug 292487] Re: [needs-packaging] jHeidi

2008-11-14 Thread freshinstall
** Description changed: jHeidi is a free, open source client for MySQL - License: GNU General Public License + License: none http://www.heidisql.com/jheidi/ ** Description changed: jHeidi is a free, open source client for MySQL - License: none + License: freeware http://www.h

[Bug 292487] Re: [needs-packaging] jHeidi

2008-11-09 Thread Teej
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] jHeidi https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://li