[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

There is an existing backport request. https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/267305 -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

This is for Intrepid. Now that it's in Intrepid, backports can be considered. See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports#How to request new packages on how to request packages in backports. -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notif

Re: [Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

Is this targetted toward intrepid as well as hardy-backports? I know libjs-jquery is becoming somewhat of a dependency for django developers and it may need to hit hardy-backports if Django 1.0.1 will find a home there as well. I know libjs-jscript depends on javascript-common and there is some n

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

This bug was fixed in the package python-django - 1.0-1ubuntu1 --- python-django (1.0-1ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low * Merge from Debian (LP: #264191), remaining changes: - Run test suite on build. [Eddy Mulyono] * Update patch to workaround network test case failures. -

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

Eddy, I can certainly understand why you were having trouble with this one. Up until the 1.0 release, Debian maintained two completely separate Django trees.. One in experimental that rather closely tracked svn, the other in sid, which tracked stable releases. The package we've shipped so far was b

Re: [Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

What are the differences between the debian sid 1.0 version and this one? Scott Kitterman wrote: > No, it's debdiff from the current Debian revision. > > .. Original Message ... > On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:15:15 - Eddy Mulyono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> @Scott: >>> Are you close to a

Re: [Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

No, it's debdiff from the current Debian revision. .. Original Message ... On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:15:15 - Eddy Mulyono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >@Scott: >> Are you close to a final debdiff for this? > >If I understand correctly, I should debdiff python- >django_0.96.2-1ubuntu2 again

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

@Eddy: >Which entries from Debian changelog should I include? Which entries should I >not include? There are tools that you can use to merge, see here for more details: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging If you go for a manual merge, you can use merge_changelog: https://lists.ubun

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

@Scott: > Are you close to a final debdiff for this? If I understand correctly, I should debdiff python- django_0.96.2-1ubuntu2 against my python-django_1.0-1ubuntu1~ppa3. Am I correct? (The deb.diff is 15.2 MB. Should I upload it anyway?) I didn't get much further than https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

@Eddy: Are you close to a final debdiff for this? Please remember to do it as a merge from the current Ubuntu version to that the Ubuntu change history is preserved. -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

1.0-1 was released to sid.. It's bandwagon time! http://packages.debian.org/sid/python-django -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

Re: [Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

On Sep 9, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Eddy Mulyono wrote: > FileSaveRaceConditionTest is giving me trouble. Sometimes it passes, > sometimes it doesn't (in both my local pbuilder and LP Soyuz). Django > upstream folks are also having problem with it with their BuildBot. I > choose to remove this test for now

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

@Scott: I think that post refers to a Django app, not Django itself. So, we probably don't want those patches. FileSaveRaceConditionTest is giving me trouble. Sometimes it passes, sometimes it doesn't (in both my local pbuilder and LP Soyuz). Django upstream folks are also having problem with it w

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

+1 from me. The django developers strongly stated that with this release there will be backwards compability for years from Version 1.0 on. This is also the reason why it took so long to get the 1.0 release out. The good thing therefore, if you get it in Intrepid: With this package Ubuntu will

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

Please have a look at http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python- modules-team/2008-September/002869.html and consider if we want those patches too. -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

Django automatically skips some tests from its testsuite if it's missing some dependencies required to run them. This next debdiff runs more tests by pulling some packages into Build- Depends-Indep (I just uploaded it to my PPA, and will have to wait a bit for build logs. Should be fine, but I'll

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

> @Eddy: would you mind to prepare a debdiff from Debian Unstable to prepare a merge for Intrepid? @Lionel: I assume you want me to `debdiff debian/python-django_1.0-1.dsc ubuntu/python-django_1.0-1ubuntu1~ppa1.dsc`. If so, you can find it attached to this comment. ** Attachment added: "debdiff d

Re: [Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

When you file for the backports, please incude your debdiff for the dependencies. Since I'm core-dev, I can upload source backports. -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

@Scott: I'm not sure there is something to do to help transitioning. Here is the page with the backward incompatible changes introduced in Django between 0.96 and 1.0: http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/BackwardsIncompatibleChanges This link is in README.Debian included in the package. As stated

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

For hardy backport we need to backport sphinx-0.4.2 and libjs-jquery There are changes in the code for the users developed apps so an automatic upgrade must be notified that most 0.96 apps won't work out of the box -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You rece

Re: [Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

It would be useful to get some 0.96 to 1.0 upgrade testing to see if there is anything we can do in packaging to ease the transition (this would go for Intrepid or a backport). -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

I am, probably along with others, concerned with what happens to 0.96 code that has completely depreciated in 1.0. Don't get me wrong, I want 1.0 to be in hardy-backports. Can we make python-django-0.96 and python-django-1.0 packages with a python-django meta-package pointing to the latest? I'd

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

Given that Lionel will do some additional tests to have it in hardy- backports and Steve Langasek recommended it for its inclusion in Lenny, +1 from me too and FFe confirmed. ** Changed in: python-django (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist Status: New => Confirmed -- python-djan

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

Plus one from me. -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubu

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

> Eddy, I know we have some ubuntu changes on this package, we have to check if there are still revelant. I know that we desactivated testsuite for the reason you have given. I had no problem with FileSaveRaceCon myself. What kind of problem did you had? I think my problem is mostly bad hardware t

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

To complete Leonel test the python-django-1.0 debian unstable package works great on intrepid. Eddy, I know we have some ubuntu changes on this package, we have to check if there are still revelant. I know that we desactivated testsuite for the reason you have given. I had no problem with FileSave

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

> OK. Who can test this package? In my PPA , I packaged 1.0-0ubuntu1~ppa1 using 1.0~beta2+ds-1 packaging information, adding some instructions to run Django's testsuite. 1.0 passes almost all the tests: https://launchpad.net/~eddymul/+archive/+build/708241

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

Builds fine in Intrepid pbuilder the python-django-1.0 debian unstable package Installs fine .. not tested yet -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

You cand find a thread on debian-release regarding having a Django 1.0 exception freeze for lenny: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/08/msg01475.html I think most of the reasons given are also valid for Ubuntu. I'll test the python-django 1.0 package from Debian in the afternoon. --

Re: [Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

OK. Who can test this package? -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailma

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

FYI, 1.0-1 just entered unstable. -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

I've been packaging it in my PPA for a while now, however I realise that most likely that won't do as it will need to be properly imported from Debian instead. -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

I suspect you are correct, but in addition to being released it needs to be packaged. Presumably Debian will do that in due course, but I've no idea when. -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

Django 1.0 has been released now. It would be really good if it will make it into the Intrepid repository. Django 0.96 is very old and hardly anyone uses it anymore. Even before Django 1.0's release, a lot of people were using the SVN because of how old 0.96 was getting. It makes very little sense

[Bug 264191] Re: python-django FFe for 1.0

Yesterday was released the RC and debian unstable has the last beta.. -- python-django FFe for 1.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.