** Changed in: poppler
Importance: Unknown => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
Title:
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
** Changed in: poppler (Debian)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
Title:
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
** Changed in: poppler (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
Title:
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
** Changed in: poppler
Importance: High => Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
Title:
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/450533
Images not showing in evince, JPX errors
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
Title:
Evince doesn't anti-alias gra
Evince is not perfect for reading Google (e)books. See attachments in which
Evince makes parts of the text completely disappear, wheras Foxit renders them
well.
Examples taken from:
http://books.google.com/ebooks?id=tMo6cAAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader
** Attachment added: "Evince Mosc
The problem is solved in 10.10.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
** Changed in: poppler
Importance: Unknown => High
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
With poppler-0.14.1 and evince-2.30.3 rebuilt on gentoo looks like fixed
too.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
same problem. pdf's with gradients (e.g. a logo) look good on okular but
very bad on evince
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
sorry, i've missed the window and posted comment to this bug. I don't
know how to delete my comment.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
I've used the patch(#30) and added patched applet to my ppa.
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:m0sia
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
The same problem with Lucid up-to-date. Sebastien Bacher, what
information do you need to consider that the issue is not fixed yet?
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
Fix released? Having the same problem in Ubuntu Lucid x64.
Adobe renders the scans much better than evince.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I would like to report the same thing happening on Lucid, Evince 2.30.0
Rendering *VERY* low quality bitmaps.
Fixing this would be a wonderful improvement of Evince experience...
Please look into this. Just take any PDF document with a bitmap inside.
Regards.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphi
I believe I've encountered the same bug in Mint 8 XFCE CE (based on Karmic).
I have evince 2.28.1-0ubuntu1.2 and, respectively, libpoppler-glib4,
libpoppler5 and poppler-utils version 0.12.0-0ubuntu2.1
Uploading screenshots of the same scanned (black-and-white) pdf:
- Pdf file:
[url=http://www.me
>the bug described there has been fixed, if you still have an issue open
a new one
Three people in this thread have reported that the bug has not been
fixed for all PDFs when viewed in Evince.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug noti
the bug described there has been fixed, if you still have an issue open
a new one
** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I changed the status back to "new" to reopen this bug because, as per
the last series of messages, the fix to poppler does not fix the
rendering in Evince for all PDFs. Sorry if this wasn't the correct
action to take; I just wanted to make sure that the bug remains visible.
** Changed in: poppler
I've attached a screen shot of two pages of the PDF posted in comment
#52 as rendered by evince in Lucid (updated on April 11).
Check out the difference in the rendering in the thumbnail images on the
left. The thumbnail for page 9, which is anti-aliased, appears in grey
tones, while the thumbnail
For me, some of the pages of document posted in #52 are anti-aliased
with the patch in Lucid, and some of the pages in that same document are
not.
I haven't found any other PDF file like that in my collection of many
hundreds of PDF files (I didn't try all of them, just several
arbitrarily chosen
I'm with #52, the document (
http://people.csail.mit.edu/bkph/papers/On_Lightness_OCR.pdf ) is nearly
unreadable.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks, I can confirm that this problem is fixed for me in Lucid Beta 1.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Hi,
this doesn't appear to be fixed, at least for the documents I'm looking
at.
For example:
http://people.csail.mit.edu/bkph/papers/On_Lightness_OCR.pdf
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
>there is no karmic change schedule for the moment no, lucid be stable
in 2 weeks
Yes, I know that lucid will be released shortly. But I myself will not
be upgrading immediately because I am working on a long project and I
want to wait until that is finished. The project involves a lot of
scanned-
> Is there any chance that the patch could be backported for Karmic?
there is no karmic change schedule for the moment no, lucid be stable in
2 weeks
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
The patch arrived in Lucid updates today, and while it fixes most of the
images, some still remain the same. For example, take the two
attachments I posted.
"evince.png" is now fixed, but the second one of Rhythmbox,
"evince2.png" remains the same. And they're both in the same PDF.
--
Evince doe
I checked out the patched version with the Lucid Daily Live CD, and it
looks great. Thanks!
Is there any chance that the patch could be backported for Karmic?
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: poppler (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/poppler
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
This bug was fixed in the package poppler - 0.12.4-0ubuntu3
---
poppler (0.12.4-0ubuntu3) lucid; urgency=low
* Updated the patch to work without having to run autotools at
buildtime
[ Josh Holland ]
* Add backport-anti-alias.patch: Fix anti aliasing (fixed in upstream git)
Josh: Your patch modifies Makefile.am without updating Makefile.in or
causing the packaging to run automake. So it fails to build the new
object and dies with a linker error.
After fixing that, it seems to work for me on the examples from this
bug, such as ubuntu-manual-draft.pdf.
I would sugges
I can verify that it fixes the problems too.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
I have fixed this in the branch. Filing a merge request.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
** Branch linked: lp:~jshholland/ubuntu/lucid/poppler/backport-anti-
alias
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
sorry the change there doesn't require cairo change I was thinking about
some other one, I reviewed this change some time ago see bug #92296 but
the difference was not obvious and none of the example of launchpad
seems to render differently, we could get the fix in still if some users
can verify it
So we can't get this in Lucid in time?
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
the current way settings are used is not optimal right but it's easier
to see which bugs have fixes which can be backported or closed in new
uploads looking at the lists
the new version will not be uploaded to lucid, it's going to be stable
after lucid and depends on an unstable cairo version
--
The bug task is labelled poppler (Ubuntu), not poppler (Ubuntu Lucid).
Since the fix is planned to be uploaded for Lucid+1, this marking is
correct.
It would be massively irresponsible to upload a development version of
poppler (0.13.x) to Lucid so late in the LTS release cycle. If you want
this
The distinction between fix committed and fix released isn't clear. I
see that the upstream bug was marked fix released which is correct. I
thought the Ubuntu-specific bug should be marked fix committed when the
fix was uploaded or in -pending, and fix released when it is actually
available for peo
Jeremy, Fix committed means that bug the bug is fixed upstream but the
package has not yet been uploaded for ubuntu but will be.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Pedro, are you sure this is "fix committed"? Has the new version of
poppler (0.13.1 or 0.13.2) been uploaded for Lucid?
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #575818
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575818
** Also affects: poppler (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575818
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://b
** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
** Attachment added: "Just another screenshot showing a different image"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42380477/evince2.png
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
Our entire team has the same issue in Ubuntu, across Karmic and Lucid.
The fonts are okay, but the images are very jagged/not anti-aliased.
I'm not sure whether this is the same issue as what we are having so I
have posted some screenshots. If it's the same bug and it has been fixed
then that is f
It is fixed in poppler 0.13.1 (unstable) and should go in the stable
0.14 branch when it comes out
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
I checked Lucid alpha 3 booted as Live-CD (evince 2.29.91, poppler
0.12.3) and this bug is not fixed there. Perhaps the fix just did not
make it into alpha 3. Otherwise the status of this bug should be
reverted.
The attached screenshot shows evince against gscan2pdf in Lucid alpha 3
rendering the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 92296 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92296
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 92296
Low quality of text rendering in Evince
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification b
the issue is fixed in git
** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
** Changed in: poppler
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
patches are welcome though.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
This bug has been around for ages and it's quite a significant one. At
least, it's one that deserves to have been patched years ago!
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Worse, Acrobat on XP :-P
2009/11/22 Alexander Jones
> acroread
>
>
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
acroread
2009/11/22 Michael Doube :
> Looking forward to this patch making it downstream. I read a lot of
> scientific literature and at the moment evince's inability to antialias
> scanned journal articles (how many of the journals distribute their
> older material) makes me kill trees by printi
Looking forward to this patch making it downstream. I read a lot of
scientific literature and at the moment evince's inability to antialias
scanned journal articles (how many of the journals distribute their
older material) makes me kill trees by printing out articles, just so
the text is legible.
** Changed in: poppler
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Also affects: poppler via
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5589
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notific
I submitted a patch to http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5589
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #5589
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5589
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because
could somebody still having the issue send this upstream to
bugs.freedesktop.org ? Thanks in advance.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
I did some research and found out that this is a Poppler bug and is
related to this bug :
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/poppler-bugs/2007-February/000828.html
also https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poppler/+bug/199916
In order to fix the above bug the interpolation default was tu
I can confirm this bug. It seems to be a problem with poppler as both
evince and epdf have this problem. Neither acroread nor xpdf have it.
This bug appeared after I upgraded to Karmic.
Attached is a screenshot of the 4 applications.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot PDF alias"
http://launchpa
acroread is what most of the academics in my department settle with, for
exactly this reason.
2009/10/31 joehill
> Hi Loafing,
>
> I'm using okular to read pdfs for the moment, and occasionally xpdf for
> all the PDFs that crash okular and evince. I haven't seen any developer
> interest in this
Hi Loafing,
I'm using okular to read pdfs for the moment, and occasionally xpdf for
all the PDFs that crash okular and evince. I haven't seen any developer
interest in this bug, so I'm not holding my breath to be able to use
evince any time soon.
On the bright side, there are several pdf readers
Still happens on Karmic for me. It is even worse than reading it using
google doc.
In the attached screen shot, the left side is open in google doc since it is an
email attachment.
The right side is open by evince.
If the problem cannot get solved, I cannot read paper on ubuntu. So
kind of I
I just upgraded to Karmic hoping for improvement, but it got worse. The AA used
to be bad, now there is none. If you look carefully at the okular vs evince
image you'll see some grey pixels in the evince rendered text. This is how it
used to look on my system also, but now there is only black an
Actually, it's not -quite- "anything non-text". It's anything in 1bit
black and white color, such as most scanned documents. Grayscale or
color images are antialiased, but for some reason not the black and
white document scans that could benefit the most. They're displayed as
eye stabbing crunch
** Attachment added: "PDF of scanned text"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32622509/zewail.pdf
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
This is embarrassing. It seems anything non-text isn't anti-aliased!
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
Same here.
I can not view b/w scans with poppler, is there no aa switch we can enable?
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
Same bug persists in Jaunty, evince version 2.26.1. Problem occurs most
frequently in scientific literature that I've downloaded. Okular and
Acrobat reader render the same PDFs just fine. Contemplating switch to
KDE...
Attached screenshot showing okular (left hand side of screen) vs evince
(right
The bug is still present in Jaunty. Evince is hardly usable for certain
documents, you have to use Okular or Adobe Reader
instead.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
I've had the same problem for as long as I can remember (i.e. since 2006
or so). My solutions so far have been either to convert the document to
djvu-format (using any2djvu) or to read it in okular (former kpdf?),
which does not have this rendering problem.
In the attachement you see to the left t
Changing bug status from 'confirmed' to 'new' per instructions on how to
re-open it. Note that I've attached evidence which confirms the bug.
** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => New
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received
Reopening bug. Attached screenshots which confirm the issue.
** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
Hi,
I can confirm that this bug is present for me in Evince (Document
Viewer) 2.24.1, which is "using poppler 0.8.7 (cairo)". I'm on Ubuntu
8.10.
This bug renders Evince useless for displaying PDFs which contain high
resolution graphs; graphs which I have to look at daily. Specifically
this is go
Same PDF rendered in Adobe Reader 8.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Adobe_Reader"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19392807/Screenshot-Adobe_Reader.png
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
I guess we disagree on whether or not the image quality in evince is
acceptable. I've been using okular recently because, for me, evince is
simply not usable for viewing graphical documents.
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248355
You received this bug notifi
We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't
hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
you can click on t
I've tried the document you attached with xpdf, adobe acrobad and evince
and it doesn't look quite different to me at least, anyways re assigning
to poppler for now
** Changed in: poppler (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: evince => poppler
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.
...and the pdf file in question (although the same applies to all the
b&w scanned pdfs I've tried).
** Attachment added: "Fernandez_Edification-sample.pdf"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16012217/Fernandez_Edification-sample.pdf
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
...another screenshot at somewhat higher magnification. Note the
artifacts around some of the letters (such as "2. Humankind") and
general jaggedness.
** Attachment added: "evince-vs-xpdf2.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16012202/evince-vs-xpdf2.png
--
Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics
h
Yes, I have hundreds of black and white documents I've scanned or
downloaded and I have the same problem with all of them. Here are two
screenshots comparing evince with xpdf and the document they come from.
Although I can basically read it in evince, it hurts my eyes and takes
me about twice as
does that happens with all the pdf images you're looking? Can you submit
a document example? May you take an screenshot of the issue? thanks,
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs)
Status: New => Incom
85 matches
Mail list logo
