OK, sorry about that.
What would have been better? to raise a new bug on the un-installable
"fixed" package? Or should I have brought it to your/someone's attention
in a completely different way?
Please remember that users who report bugs are trying to help the
developers.
--
evolution requires
don't reopen bugs only because the fixed version is not installable due
to transitionnal issues
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) => (unassigned)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
evolution requires spamassassin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2363
Thanks Michael - quick work!
BUT - the latest update to apt is not installable. It requires removal
of a whole mess of apps, including aptitude and synaptic, plus various
other stuff..
I don't know if you can fix this as fast - but it would sure be nice.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
St
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 0.7.14ubuntu3
---
apt (0.7.14ubuntu3) intrepid; urgency=low
[ Otavio Salvador ]
* Apply patch to avoid truncating of arbitrary files. Thanks to Bryan
Donlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for the patch. Closes: #482476
* Avoid using dbus if dbus-
seems to be an apt issue
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: evolution => apt
--
evolution requires spamassassin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236360
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
I have at last tracked down the glitch. It seems that yet another
package designed to work with evolution, nautilus-sendto, has evolution
as a recommends, and evolution has spamassassin and gnome-pilot as
recommends, so the update-manager sees the 2-step connection and keeps
flagging spamassassin a
Hoping this change back to New status will ensure someone reads my last
comment I'm still not convinced that there is no problem.
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
evolution requires spamassassin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236360
You received this bug no
Sebastian,
Thanks for the explanation - glad to know that it was an intentional
change between Hardy and Intrepid.
However, I am afraid there is still a problem. Having been using the
package system for over a year now, I do expect it itself to remain
stable and reliable, and I have found out var
thank you for your bug report, you should maybe not start using unstable
distributions so earlier in the cycle if you don't know how to use the
package system and want to have something stable and not changing. the
packaging tools have been changed in intrepid to install recommends by
default now a
