[Bug 236051] Re: main inclusion review for openbabel

2008-09-24 Thread Kees Cook
Looks good to me, thanks for getting everything addressed. ** Changed in: openbabel (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released -- main inclusion review for openbabel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 236051] Re: main inclusion review for openbabel

2008-08-22 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Nuff blocking. Moved to main, set as beta milestone. ** Changed in: openbabel (Ubuntu Intrepid) Target: None => ubuntu-8.10-beta -- main inclusion review for openbabel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 236051] Re: main inclusion review for openbabel

2008-07-30 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: openbabel (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- main inclusion review for openbabel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lis

[Bug 236051] Re: main inclusion review for openbabel

2008-07-30 Thread Matthias Klose
back to Jamie, Kees for review. ** Changed in: openbabel (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jonathan Riddell (jr) => Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) -- main inclusion review for openbabel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bu

[Bug 236051] Re: main inclusion review for openbabel

2008-07-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
2.2 synced, re-opening so this can be reconsidered. ** Changed in: openbabel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- main inclusion review for openbabel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236051 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 236051] Re: main inclusion review for openbabel

2008-07-07 Thread Martin Pitt
Geoff, thanks for the follow-up! Seems that we should get 2.2.0-final into Intrepid (we have beta5 at the moment). Jonathan, any chance you could test the 2.2.0-1 from Debian experimental? If it works, we should sync it over. I do consider it security sensitive in a way that such file formats are

[Bug 236051] Re: main inclusion review for openbabel

2008-07-04 Thread Geoff Hutchison
I'm one of the upstream maintainers. We just released 2.2.0-final, which addresses all these and some other internally-discovered issues, including some minor denial-of-service issues with malformed data. (For example, the code could consume large amounts of memory.) We do compile with -Wformat-se

[Bug 236051] Re: main inclusion review for openbabel

2008-06-13 Thread Kees Cook
I see a few cases of being able to run off the stack during sprintf. I'd prefer all the sprintfs were checked and replaced with snprintf, but it looks to be a large task: $ grep -R sprintf . | wc -l 472 As long as this compiles without warnings from -Wformat-security and compiles with the now

[Bug 236051] Re: main inclusion review for openbabel

2008-06-09 Thread Martin Pitt
Package looks ok in general, but it is massively reading/parsing a lot of different file formats. Jamie, Kees, can you please give this an inspection for general code quality and common vulnerabilities? Thanks! ** Changed in: openbabel (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Security Team (