[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2010-05-11 Thread TEN
Thanks, as you can see in the screenshot this does apply to Lucid now (missing transcode and mjpegtools). -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2010-05-11 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Sure will, those were meant to be removed from the archive but weren't. Maverick will have the packages synced from debian, and any extra packages purged. There are other efforts to package e-tobi vdr for ubuntu, use them. ** Changed in: vdr-plugin-burn (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Confirmed => W

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2010-05-11 Thread TEN
Please tell me a similar issue will not persist for years in Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx, the new LTS, again... ** Attachment added: "vdr-plugin-burn not installable (due to unmet dependencies)" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48274923/vdr-plugin-burn.png -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-07-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/vdr-plugin-burn -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-05-01 Thread TEN
Using wrap_text with the latest optimizations from http://vdr- portal.de/board/thread.php?postid=811277#post811277 in gdwrapper.c, please rebuild this package for the official repository to finally provide this plugin for the LTS. -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.l

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-04-01 Thread TEN
The wrapping code has been rewritten to fix the garbled output (DVD menus) as well, cf. http://vdr- portal.de/board/thread.php?threadid=85412, and rolled into the attached tarball. vdr-plugin-burn can be made installable and usable this way, but I will have to leave it to someone more familiar wit

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-03-17 Thread TEN
With the IRC-granted blessings of the original author of this VDR plugin (wishing to be known as lordjaxom), please find enclosed my diffs to (hopefully) patch this package into usability on Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Hardy Heron, with a standard disclaimer of "at your own risk, AFAIK, IMHO, HTH, YMMV..."

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-03-15 Thread TEN
The correct setting in/etc/vdr/plugins/plugin.burn.conf is --iso=/mnt/your/video/iso chown vdr:vdr is needed on this directory as well as every subdirectory and menu-bg.png below /var/lib/vdr/plugins/burn/skins, as is usermod -a -G cdrom vdr to avoid the errors as in http://de.pastebin.ca/1361397

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-03-15 Thread TEN
Further pieces of information to spare users some headaches: Before dpkg-buildpackage is invoked, nano -w vdr-plugin-burn-0.1.0~pre21/setup.c to replace demuxtype_vdrsync with demuxtype_projectx in line 89. Before the final /etc/init.d/vdr, unless there is a writeable /video/iso on your system,

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-03-14 Thread TEN
Let alone could a user be expected to figure out how to build this thing (see http://www.e-tobi.net/blog/2008/12/02/vdr-plugin-survey-2008 -results-part-2 for its importance and level of difficulty), and yet here is the walkthrough to the best of my knowledge (YMMV, not replayed yet to fully exclud

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-03-06 Thread Timo Aaltonen
I have no hardy machines left, so it's very low on the list. Don't use "LTS" as a hammer to make it any more important, since vdr* is in universe and supported only by volunteers (=me). If it's that important to you, then I'd suggest to upgrade to intrepid or build the packages yourself either in a

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-03-06 Thread TEN
Is there any reason still not to fix these dependencies for the LTS?! A year's wait later, please do put this bug's importance a notch up now. Unnecessarily lacking the ability to author DVDs (the differentiating factor where it has the edge over most commercial DVRs) has become a major showstopp

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-02-04 Thread Timo Aaltonen
so marking as fixed, leaving hardy open. ** Changed in: vdr-plugin-burn (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-02-04 Thread TEN
Fixed for Intrepid only, still unresolved for current LTS (2008-2013). ** Changed in: vdr-plugin-burn (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: vdr-plugin-burn (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2009-01-31 Thread TEN
This bug seems to have been sitting unresolved for far too long: vdr-genindex as per the first follow-ups should simply be brought back into Hardy as well (this rather than Intrepid being the LTS we have to live with until 2011!). vdrsync (which has stopped working reliably at least with DVB stre

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2008-10-27 Thread Luca Falavigna
This require a more complex fix since vdrsync and vdr-genindex are not available in Hardy. Switching to New until a proper fix is found. ** Changed in: vdr-plugin-burn (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Confirmed => New -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2008-08-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package vdr-plugin-burn - 0.1.0~pre21-29build1 --- vdr-plugin-burn (0.1.0~pre21-29build1) intrepid; urgency=low * Sync from e-tobi.net, no Ubuntu changes. (LP: #226072) vdr-plugin-burn (0.1.0~pre21-29) experimental; urgency=low * Dropped patchlevel cont

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2008-08-04 Thread Luca Falavigna
ACK from motu-sru, please fix this in Hardy. It still happens on Intrepid too. ** Changed in: vdr-plugin-burn (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided => Medium Status: New => Confirmed -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226072 You received

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2008-06-28 Thread TEN
Package is still not installable. The default demultiplexer should be projectx rather than vdrsync anyway, as the latter seems more likely to stop when encountering issues with less-than-perfect (but playable) DVB streams. ** Attachment added: "vdr-plugin-burn.HardyHeron.png" http://launchpadl

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2008-05-22 Thread tavasti
I put my self compiled packages available to http://ax3.vuo.ro/~tavasti/vdr-src/e-tobi/ Use at your own risk. -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2008-05-07 Thread ronzo
How big is the chance that there will be xxv and some more vdr-plugins in Intrepid? -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bug

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2008-05-07 Thread Timo Aaltonen
vdr-genindex uploaded to Intrepid. When it has passed the NEW queue, it'll be SRU'd. -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bu

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2008-05-07 Thread Timo Aaltonen
so mkisofs dep could be changed to genisoimage, and projectx -> project-x. Then vdr-genindex should be pulled from e-tobi.net and uploaded as an SRU along with vdr-plugin-burn and all should be ok. -- vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226072 You rece

[Bug 226072] Re: vdr-plugin-burn depends on non-existent packages

2008-05-07 Thread Timo Aaltonen
Indeed, there are a couple of bugs here.. vdr-genindex is missing, that's an oversight due to my box having an old version installed. This package should be in multiverse rather than universe, since mkisofs is there, and projectx is called project-x in ubuntu. sigh, I was apparently too busy doing