[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2013-03-06 Thread Thomas Hotz
Marking as confirmed then... ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225611 Title: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files To m

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2009-04-08 Thread François Bouffard
I'm also affected by the bug. I'm not sure if untexing the .tex files is wise anyway -- I recently found myself searching for LaTeX commands for which I've long forgotten the syntax , knowing that I used them in an old document. -- tracker inconsistecies with .tex files https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-11-25 Thread jaquemaire
bonjour tout le monde, I suffer the same problem as Romano's. I used to index my .tex files in winXP with Copernic Desktop, and I wish it could be done (with tracker) in ubuntu. Wht can't tracker consider .tex files as text files ? regards, alex -- tracker inconsistecies with .tex files https:

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-07-08 Thread Romano Giannetti
Too few users of LaTeX, I suppose. -- tracker inconsistecies with .tex files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.u

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-06 Thread Romano Giannetti
Installed untex and re-indexed, still the same problem, so the problem is still here. Moreover, .tex files are akin to program sources, so they should be indexed as text (the same as .py or .c files). ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- tracker inconsistecies with .t

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
BTW, I found this: May 5 10:49:32 rukbat kernel: [28930.604863] tracker-extract[25166]: segfault at 6562696c ip b7dbb283 sp bfe9c80c error 4 in libc-2.7.so[b7d49000+149000] in my logs during re-index. Dunno if it could be related. -- tracker inconsistecies with .tex files https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-05 Thread Romano Giannetti
Ok, installed untex and checked, rebuilt the database (re-index), still no joy. Look: (0)rukbat:~/research/ferrite% wajig list untex ii untex 9210-10 Remove LaTeX commands from input (0)rukbat:~/research/ferrite% tracker-search

Re: [Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Michael Biebl wrote: > 2008/5/5 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I'll add untex to tracker's recommends > > It already is (at least in the Debian package). Maybe you should just > sync the Ubuntu package. Ah, thanks Michael, you're right. It's also in the Ubuntu package, problem is

Re: [Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-04 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 22:52 +, Jamie McCracken wrote: > well sorry for being hasty but the way tracker works is to spawn untex > filename which will always return nothing if you dont have untex > installed I understand. I am sorry if I sounded harsh, but probably I am a bit dense... I suppose

Re: [Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-04 Thread Michael Biebl
2008/5/5 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'll add untex to tracker's recommends It already is (at least in the Debian package). Maybe you should just sync the Ubuntu package. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are poi

Re: [Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
I'll add untex to tracker's recommends -- tracker inconsistecies with .tex files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lis

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-04 Thread Jamie McCracken
well sorry for being hasty but the way tracker works is to spawn untex filename which will always return nothing if you dont have untex installed Im not sure I want to change that yet as indexing unfiltered files might lead to garbage going into the index (that applies to all files that need filt

Re: [Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-04 Thread Romano Giannetti
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 20:20 +, Felipe Figueiredo wrote: > Jamie, just for completeness of the issue, shouldn't tracker index .tex > files even without untex (index with \TeX tags)? This doesn't seem to be > happening. Yes, that was my guess, too. The filter script installed should have indexed

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-02 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
Jamie, just for completeness of the issue, shouldn't tracker index .tex files even without untex (index with \TeX tags)? This doesn't seem to be happening. Also I have a wishlist, that might be right for this bug report: when a .tex file is found, tracker should also ignore the sattellite files wi

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-02 Thread Jamie McCracken
You need untex installed and then need to reindex not a bug but all dependent apps must be installed prior to indexing or a reindex performed post install ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- tracker inconsistecies with .tex files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

Re: [Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-02 Thread Romano Giannetti
> Should we set this report to invalid, if you get the expected results > from tracker after installing untex? I guess the mere existence of this > report will serve as documentation for nextcomers. Maybe. I will be without internet for the next two days, then I will report. If all is starting to

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-02 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
I too had some but not all tex files indexed. After installing untex, and giving it a while to catch up, I can now consistently find my .tex files searching by name or by content. Since untex is already registered as a dependency for tracker (recommends), I'm concluding this is not a bug at all (n

Re: [Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-02 Thread Romano Giannetti
I installed untex, I'll report back. On the other hand, I checked the tracked filters, and I have: (0)rukbat:~/research/ferrite/imtc07-journal% cat /usr/lib/tracker/filters/text/x-tex_filter #!/bin/sh UNTEX=`which untex` if [ -n "$UNTEX" ]; then nice -n19 $UNTEX "$1" > "$2"; else cat "$1" > "$2"

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-02 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
Workaround: install the package 'untex' available in universe. Please confirm if this works for you. -- tracker inconsistecies with .tex files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-02 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
Additional information regarding upstream progress: http://osdir.com/ml/freedesktop.tracker/2006-12/msg00039.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02976.html ** Changed in: tracker (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- tracker inconsistecies with .tex files https://bugs.la

[Bug 225611] Re: tracker inconsistecies with .tex files

2008-05-02 Thread Romano Giannetti
Just to add a bit of data: my .tex files are encoded in a mix of encoding, someone is in ASCII, others are in utf-8, others are in iso-8859-1. But it seems that the problem is unrelated to the encoding. -- tracker inconsistecies with .tex files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225611 You received