ipe change will be managed in bug #236322.
** Changed in: ipe (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
Copied to hardy-updates.
** Changed in: tk-brief (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
OK won't fix for the IPE in Hardy is fine with me. I just wanted to
make sure that the deprecated latex-ucs doesn't creep into intrepid. But
since this is hopefully taken care of by bug #236322 all should be well.
Thanks Guys.
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
ok, marking ipe in hardy as won't fix then.
Dietmar, thanks for following up on bug #236322, so I hope that ipe in
intrepid will be fixed soon :).
** Changed in: ipe (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You rec
I fear adjusting Recommends field is not worth a SRU, unless there are
more valid reasons to prepare an update (e.g. switching to xdg-open as
Stefan did).
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Luca, In the ipe package the recommends section needs to be updated to
from 'latex-ucs' to 'texlive-latex-recommended'
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
I must admit, that I haven't really looked at ipe.
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
HARDY VERIFICATION
Using version 5.9-1ubuntu3 from hardy-release:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
tk-brief: Depends: latex-ucs but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
Using version 5.9-1ubuntu3.1 from hardy-proposed:
Package installs correctly.
** Changed in: tk-brief (Ubu
What's the status for ipe source package? Is it affected too?
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
Thanks Stefan, found it now. Well Synaptic doesn't know about the
virtual packages...that's why I didn't find it in the first place.
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
Dietmar, thanks for testing!
pdf-viewer is a virtual package provided by xpdf, evince, evince-gtk,
kpdf et al. That way, the recommends are met, if one of these packages
is installed. With aptitude, you can look exactly what packages provide
pdf-viewer.
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
tk-brief has broke
Testresult: Install and program run works in Hardy, thanks.
Stefan, is 'pdf-viewer' just a term or an actual package that I just miss to
find in the repos?
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Accepted into hardy-proposed, please test.
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
new proposed debdiff, which now uses xdg-open and also doesn't recommend
the transitional xpdf package any longer (thanks Dietmar!)
** Attachment added: "proposed2.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15181887/proposed2.debdiff
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
Sure, go ahead.
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf
Oh, heh, the CVS dir comes from dpkg-source intervening. I'll rebuild with -i
something to trick dpkg-source into not removing that.
Thanks for the xdg-open thingy. I'll upload a new version to intrepid first and
then one to -proposed. motu-sru, ok with that?
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
Rejecting from hardy-proposed, the upload was not a minimal diff, it
deleted a CVS directory.
"I'm not aware of a generic mechanism to call a pdf-viewer" xdg-open is
the supported method.
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notificati
Stefan, sorry I need to read the comments more carefully in the future.
Well I don't know a proper way to call a pdf-viewer either. Also after
having had a look at the available unbiased pdf-viewer alternatives,
xpdf is probably not all that bad. Although the evince-gtk package is
independent of Gn
ah, heh. Haven't looked in depth about xpdf vs. xpdf-reader, but that's
not really a problem for hardy-updates.
However as I stated in comment 6, the problem is tk-brief directly called
acroread, which I changed to xpdf. Now since xpdf, evince and kpdf don't use
the alternate system, I'm not awa
Stefan, one other thing I just noticed. You added xpdf in the
'recommends' section. But 'xpdf' is only a transitional package and the
real package should be 'xpdf-reader'. And while at it, why not changing
the 'recommends' section to a Ubuntu maintained package like 'evince' or
'kpdf', etc., depend
OK now that I used my search engine of choice for "SRU team" (which I
should have done *before* posting my last comment) I understand the
procedure. Thanks for clarifying :)
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you a
Dietmar, that's what the SRU is about. Once an archive-admin accepts the
upload into hardy-proposed, it needs to be tested there and if all goes
well it can go into hardy-updates after one week ;).
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug no
Would it be possible to backport it to hardy as well? I mean Intrepid is
still a couple of moth away.. ;)
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
Thanks, uploaded as 5.9-1ubuntu3.1.
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu
ACK from motu-sru.
Please, adjust version to 5.9-1ubuntu3.1 and go ahead.
** Changed in: tk-brief (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Dear SRU team (welcome new members btw!), please consider this debdiff
for hardy:
- in hardy, texlive-latex-recommended doesn't provide latex-ucs yet, making
tk-brief uninstallable.
- also, tk-brief strangely calls acroread, which is not available in the
archive (I've changed this to xpdf, other
** Attachment added: "proposed.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15111864/proposed.debdiff
** Changed in: tk-brief (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Confirmed => New
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: tk-brief
tk-brief depends on latex-ucs in Hardy. But the ucs package is now part
of texlive-latex-recommended. Therefore tk-brief can not be installed in
Hardy. This should be changed ASAP as it makes this package useless
otherwise.
+
+ al
** Changed in: tk-brief (Ubuntu Hardy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => StefanPotyra (sistpoty)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
This bug was fixed in the package tk-brief - 5.9-1ubuntu4
---
tk-brief (5.9-1ubuntu4) intrepid; urgency=low
* debian/control: change depends from latex-ucs to
texlive-latex-recommended (LP: #220910).
* tkBrief: change acroread_command from acroread to xpdf, also
adding thi
thanks for the bug. I'll upload a fixed version to intrepid soon.
** Changed in: tk-brief (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => StefanPotyra (sistpoty)
Status: New => In Progress
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notificatio
ahh...now I understand why Dietmar mentioned IPE. Sorry for the noise...
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
I can approve the problem ... and the conclusion.
@Dietmar: What means "in case of IPE"? Is there a workaround?
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
-
in case of IPE it's not so bad as it only recommends the latex-ucs
package. Still I think this needs to be fixed.
--
tk-brief has broken dependencies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220910
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
34 matches
Mail list logo
