[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-22 Thread Frank Heimes
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089148

[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package zfcp-hbaapi - 2.2.0-0ubuntu4 --- zfcp-hbaapi (2.2.0-0ubuntu4) plucky; urgency=medium * d/p/libzfcphbaapi-c99.patch: Fix FTBFS (LP: #2089148) * This implicitly is also a rebuild against libsgutils2-1.48 -- Christian Ehrhardt Wed, 20 Nov 2024 11

[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-21 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
sg3-utils 1.48 is ready, uploaded this -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089148 Title: FTBFS in late oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/u

[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/zfcp-hbaapi/+git/zfcp-hbaapi/+merge/476878 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089148 Title: FTBFS in late

[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Fheimes will discuss with IBM if they still need it, if they maintain things or if removal from Plucky is the better path forward. If this response is in time for the transition for sg3-utils - fine If not we can remove it from plucky, and thereby unblock the transition - increasing the time to r

[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
OTOH it isn't hard, debugging led me to the code failing and looking around with the context in mind made me find [1]. That would likely fix it for us as well, giving it a try ... Even if it fixes that, it is still worth to check the reasons we have it if there really is no upstream behind it. [

[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
The patch works, making this build again. I'll upload that one as part of the sg3-utils transition, but would still appreciate the "does it still make sense" discussion to happen. ** Changed in: zfcp-hbaapi (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: zfcp-hbaapi (Ubuntu) Ass

[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
used to be on http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/zfcp- hbaapi.html But https://github.com/openmainframeproject/zfcp-hbaapi/tree/master still exists Which is just a single commit of the state as-is :-/ No releases, no tags, no commits -- You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-20 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
No reverse dependencies, no love by upstream since Focal. Discussing with Fheimes if a removal might be more appropriate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089148 Title: FTBFS in late o

[Bug 2089148] Re: FTBFS in late oracular

2024-11-20 Thread Frank Heimes
** Tags added: s390x -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2089148 Title: FTBFS in late oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zfcp