I see that 5.3.0-1 in Oracular does contain the fix.
** Changed in: lxml (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076419
Title:
lxml: Doe
For the Test Plan, I had asked in comment 1:
> ...specify what the output should look like
I've added something suitable for you. I guess this is what you intend?
It's important to be clear in case you're unavailable and someone else
needs to do the SRU verification, or if there's a regression fo
lxml is ready IMO
** Changed in: lxml (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076419
Title:
lxml: Does not respect compiler flags
To manage
I have improved the test case now. I wasn't aware you can copy it back
from the rejected queue (or forgot), and I irregularly delete past
uploads, so that could have meant recreating it.
Most of the time, if a test plan is lacking a bit, the SRU gets accepted
with a note to add some missing bits t
You could have fixed the test plan as I requested instead of
complaining?
FYI, you can find the upload in the rejected queue. The SRU team can
even accept from the rejected queue. It should be minimal work to do
this.
On the other hand the current SRU workflow requires SRU team members to
continu
Please don't reject valid and important uploads over review questions,
this is creating unnecessary additional work in trying to find the
upload again or having to re-do it from scratch.
I'm sure you are very well aware we're still starting a broader process
on these uploads to enable frame pointe
(or if this is already being done by automated tests, then just point to
them and that's fine)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076419
Title:
lxml: Does not respect compiler flags
To
> Parse some xml and see that it works
This isn't a full review (yet), but please expand on this, so that a
different developer will unambiguously do the same thing as you intend
when performing SRU verification. You could attach a minimal XML file
and specify exactly how lxml is to be used to par
